Solidarity obo Barnard and Another v South African Police Services (JS455/07) [2010] ZALC 10; 2010 (10) BCLR 1094 (LC) ; (2010) 31 ILJ 742 (LC); [2010] 5 BLLR 561 (LC) (24 February 2010)

Solidarity obo Barnard and Another v South African Police Services (JS455/07) [2010] ZALC 10; 2010 (10) BCLR 1094 (LC) ; (2010) 31 ILJ 742 (LC); [2010] 5 BLLR 561 (LC) (24 February 2010)

The court found that the respondent failed to promote the applicant, despite her being the best candidate, solely because of her race, which constituted unfair discrimination. The respondent's reliance on numerical targets in its Employment Equity Plan was applied too rigidly, without proper consideration of the applicant's individual rights to equality and dignity, her employment history, and the impact on service delivery. The respondent did not provide sufficient evidence or justification for its decision, nor did it engage meaningfully in mediation and conciliation procedures. The failure to appoint any candidate to the post was not shown to be a rational or fair method of...

Citation
[2010] ZALC 10
Parties
Applicant: Solidarity obo Mrs R M Barnard; Respondent: South African Police Services
Court
Labour Court
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
24 February 2010
Case Number
JS455/07
Procedural Posture
Unfair Discrimination Application / Trial and Final Judgment
Outcome
Application granted. The respondent is ordered to promote the applicant to the post of Superintendent with effect from 27 July 2006 and to pay the applicant's costs.
Judges
P J Pretorius
Legal Topics
Employment Equity Act, Affirmative Action, Unfair Discrimination, Promotion, Burden of Proof, Service Delivery
Labour Law Constitutional Law Employment Equity Act Affirmative Action Unfair Discrimination Promotion Burden of Proof Service Delivery

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Solidarity obo Mrs R M Barnard

Applicant

South African Police Services

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Unfair Discrimination Application / Trial and Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the respondent's failure to promote the applicant constituted unfair discrimination based on race.
  2. 2 Whether the implementation of the Employment Equity Plan was rational and fair in the circumstances.
  3. 3 Whether the respondent discharged its burden to prove that the discrimination was fair.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondent failed to promote the applicant, despite her being the best candidate, solely because of her race, which constituted unfair discrimination. The respondent's reliance on numerical targets in its Employment Equity Plan was applied too rigidly, without proper consideration of the applicant's individual rights to equality and dignity, her employment history, and the impact on service delivery. The respondent did not provide sufficient evidence or justification for its decision, nor did it engage meaningfully in mediation and conciliation procedures. The failure to appoint any candidate to the post was not shown to be a rational or fair method of...

Court Disposition

Application granted. The respondent is ordered to promote the applicant to the post of Superintendent with effect from 27 July 2006 and to pay the applicant's costs.

Orders

  • The respondent is directed to promote the applicant to the post of Superintendent with effect from 27 July 2006.
  • The respondent is ordered to pay the applicant's costs.