Solidarity v Minister of Safety And Security and Others (J 879/12) [2016] ZALCJHB 107 (22 March 2016)

Solidarity v Minister of Safety And Security and Others (J 879/12) [2016] ZALCJHB 107 (22 March 2016)

The court held that, because the judgment in this matter is significantly connected to the decision of the Labour Appeal Court in Solidarity & others v Department of Correctional Services & others, which is itself under appeal in the Constitutional Court, it would be anomalous not to grant leave to appeal. The...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] ZALCJHB 107
Parties
Applicant: Solidarity; Respondent: Minister of Safety And Security; Respondent: Minister of Labour; Respondent: National Commissioner of the South African Police Service; Respondent: South African Police Union; Amicus Curiae: Police and Prisons Civil Rights Union
Court
Labour Court Johannesburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Case Number
J 879/12
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal
Outcome
Leave to appeal against the judgment handed down on 26 January 2016 is granted to the applicants for leave to appeal. Costs shall be costs in the appeal.
Judges
Lagrange
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal, Employment Equity, Affirmative Action
Labour Law Leave to Appeal Employment Equity Affirmative Action

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Solidarity

Applicant

Minister of Safety And Security

Respondent

Minister of Labour

Respondent

National Commissioner of the South African Police Service

Respondent

South African Police Union

Respondent

Police and Prisons Civil Rights Union

Amicus Curiae

Procedural Posture

Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal

  1. 1 Whether leave to appeal should be granted against the judgment handed down on 26 January 2016.
  2. 2 Whether the pending Constitutional Court appeal in a related matter justifies granting leave to appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that, because the judgment in this matter is significantly connected to the decision of the Labour Appeal Court in Solidarity & others v Department of Correctional Services & others, which is itself under appeal in the Constitutional Court, it would be anomalous not to grant leave to appeal. The interests of justice and the need for consistency in the application of employment equity and affirmative action principles justify granting leave to appeal.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal against the judgment handed down on 26 January 2016 is granted to the applicants for leave to appeal. Costs shall be costs in the appeal.

Orders

  • Leave to appeal against the judgment in this matter handed down on 26 January 2016 is granted to the applicants for leave to appeal.
  • Costs shall be costs in the appeal.