Download PDF

South Africa Judgment

Labour Court Johannesburg

South African Commercial Catering and Allied Workers Union obo Mokebe v Pick and Pay Retailers (Pty) Ltd (JS 636-20) [2024] ZALCJHB 78 (22 February 2024)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court held that the rules and practice manual governing applications for leave to appeal are binding and cannot be circumvented by agreement between the parties. Since the applicants did not file a condonation application for the late filing of their application for leave to appeal, the court lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate the matter. The application for leave to appeal was therefore struck off the roll.

Court disposition

Application for leave to appeal struck off the roll for want of jurisdiction.

Orders

  • The application is struck off the roll for want of jurisdiction.

02

Material facts

Parties

South African Commercial Catering and Allied Workers Union obo Bonolo Mokebe

Applicant

Pick n Pay Retailers (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Absolution From the Instance

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicants argued that the judgment only came to the attention of their attorney on 25 October 2023 and that the parties agreed the dies for launching the application for leave to appeal would run from 26 October 2023. They contended that it was unnecessary to bring a condonation application for late filing.
Respondent
The respondent opposed the application, maintaining that the rules and practice manual of the Labour Court are binding and that condonation is required for late filing. Without a formal condonation application, the court lacks jurisdiction to entertain the leave to appeal.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Rules for the Conduct of Proceedings in the Labour Court as Promulgated by GN 1665 in GG 17495 of 14 October 1996

    Rule 30 of the Labour Court Rules prescribes the timeframe for bringing an application for leave to appeal and allows extension only on good cause shown.

  2. 02

    The Practice Manual of the Labour Court of South Africa, effective 2 April 2013

    The Practice Manual of the Labour Court is binding on practitioners and cannot be varied by agreement between parties.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court held that the rules and practice manual governing applications for leave to appeal are binding and cannot be circumvented by agreement between the parties. Since the applicants did not file a condonation application for the late filing of their application for leave to appeal, the court lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate the matter. The application for leave to appeal was therefore struck off the roll.

Obiter and limits

  • Practitioners are bound by the rules and practice manual of the Labour Court and cannot create exceptions to suit themselves.
  • It is the court, not the parties, that determines whether condonation should be granted for late filings.

Court disposition

Application for leave to appeal struck off the roll for want of jurisdiction.

  • The application is struck off the roll for want of jurisdiction.

Source and reliance status

Labour Court Johannesburg

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Labour Court Johannesburg

Judgment

[2024] ZALCJHB 78

IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG

Not Reportable

Case No: JS636/20

In the matter between:

SOUTH

AFRICAN COMMERCIAL CATERING AND

ALLIED WORKERS UNION obo BONOLO MOKEBE

Applicant

and

PICK N PAY RETAILERS (PTY)

LTD

Respondent

Heard: In Chambers

Delivered: 22 January 2024 (This judgment was handed down electronically by circulation to the parties’ legal representatives by email, publication on the Labour Court website and release to SAFLII. The date and time for handing-down is deemed to be 10h00 on 22 January 2024.)

JUDGMENT

APPLICATION

FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL

PHEHANE, J

[1] The applicants bring an application for leave to appeal against the judgment and order of this Court on absolution from the instance,

handed down on 15 August 2023. The application is opposed by the respondent.

[2] In their application, delivered on 15 November 2023, the applicants state that the judgment only came to the attention of their attorney of record on 25 October 2023 and that the parties came to an agreement that the dies within which to launch the application for leave to appeal can start running from 26 October 2023 and that it is not necessary for the applicants to bring an application for condonation for its late filing.

[3] Rule 30 of the Rules of this Court[1] makes provision in mandatory terms, for the timeframe within which an application for leave to appeal must be brought and should such application not be brought within the prescribed timeframe, then the Court may, on good cause shown, extend that period.

[4] It has been overstated that the rules of this Court and the provisions of the Practice Manual[2] are binding on practitioners. It is not the practitioners that are to make rules and provisions outside of the aforesaid prescripts to suit themselves. It is the Court that is to grant, or not grant condonation.

[5] In the absence of an application for condonation for the late filing of this application, this Court lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate the application for leave to appeal.

[6] In the premises, the following order is made:

Order:

1. The application is struck off the roll for want of jurisdiction.

M. T. M. Phehane

Judge of the Labour Court of South Africa

[1] Rules for the Conduct of Proceedings in the Labour Court as Promulgated by GN 1665 in GG 17495 of 14 October 1996.

[2] The Practice Manual of the Labour Court of South Africa, effective 2 April 2013.

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Rules for the Conduct of Proceedings in the Labour Court as Promulgated by GN 1665 in GG 17495 of 14 October 1996

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

The Practice Manual of the Labour Court of South Africa, effective 2 April 2013

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.