South African Municipal Workers Union and Another v Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration and Others (JR2220/15) [2018] ZALCJHB 243 (10 July 2018)
The court found that the arbitrator's award was reasonable and supported by the evidence. The arbitrator properly considered whether Mr Bhengu had pleaded guilty to the charges, the nature of his misconduct, and the appropriateness of the sanction. The disciplinary code provided that the managing director or nominee decides appeals, and in this case, the appeal chairperson acted as the nominee. However, the managing director's subsequent rejection of the appeal chairperson's recommendation did not invalidate the dismissal, as the code did not provide for the appeal chairperson to make a mere recommendation but to decide the appeal. The arbitrator's findings on dishonesty, trustworthiness,...
- Citation
- [2018] ZALCJHB 243
- Parties
- Applicant: South African Municipal Workers Union; Applicant: Simon Bhengu; Respondent: Commission for Conciliation, Mediation & Arbitration; Respondent: Eric Myhill, N.O.; Respondent: City Power Johannesburg SOC Ltd
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 10 July 2018
- Case Number
- JR 2220/15
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment on Review of Arbitration Award
- Outcome
- Review application dismissed.
- Judges
- Lagrange
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Disciplinary Code Interpretation, Procedural Fairness, Substantive Fairness, Ultra Vires Decision, Trust Relationship
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
South African Municipal Workers Union
Applicant
Simon Bhengu
Applicant
Commission for Conciliation, Mediation & Arbitration
Respondent
Eric Myhill, N.O.
Respondent
City Power Johannesburg SOC Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment on Review of Arbitration Award
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the arbitrator's award upholding the dismissal of Mr Bhengu was reasonable on the evidence presented.
- 2 Whether the managing director acted ultra vires in imposing the sanction of dismissal contrary to the disciplinary code.
- 3 Whether the failure to call the managing director as a witness rendered the arbitration unfair.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the arbitrator's award was reasonable and supported by the evidence. The arbitrator properly considered whether Mr Bhengu had pleaded guilty to the charges, the nature of his misconduct, and the appropriateness of the sanction. The disciplinary code provided that the managing director or nominee decides appeals, and in this case, the appeal chairperson acted as the nominee. However, the managing director's subsequent rejection of the appeal chairperson's recommendation did not invalidate the dismissal, as the code did not provide for the appeal chairperson to make a mere recommendation but to decide the appeal. The arbitrator's findings on dishonesty, trustworthiness,...
Court Disposition
Review application dismissed.
Orders
- The review application is dismissed.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment