South African Transport and Allied Workers Union and Others v MSC Depots (Pty) Ltd and Others (D 449/2011) [2012] ZALCD 10; (2013) 34 ILJ 706 (LC) (16 July 2012)
The court held that the employer was bound by both the agreement to refer allegations of misconduct to pre-dismissal arbitration under section 188A of the Labour Relations Act and the subsequent court order affirming that agreement. The employer could not unilaterally revoke its consent to the arbitration process,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2012] ZALCD 10
- Parties
- Applicant: South African Transport and Allied Workers Union; Applicant: ME Buleni; Applicant: DD Jali; Respondent: MSC Depots (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration; Respondent: BD Nayager NO
- Court
- Labour Court Durban
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 16 July 2012
- Case Number
- D 449/2011
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Application for Final Declaratory and Consequential Relief Following Urgent Proceedings
- Outcome
- Application granted. Dismissals set aside. Employer ordered to comply with agreement and court order regarding pre-dismissal arbitration.
- Judges
- A van Niekerk
- Legal Topics
- Pre Dismissal Arbitration, Section 188a, Breach of Agreement, Review of Arbitration Award, Disciplinary Procedure, Remedies for Unlawful Dismissal
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
South African Transport and Allied Workers Union
Applicant
ME Buleni
Applicant
DD Jali
Applicant
MSC Depots (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration
Respondent
BD Nayager NO
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Application for Final Declaratory and Consequential Relief Following Urgent Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the employer was bound by the agreement to refer allegations of misconduct to pre-dismissal arbitration under section 188A of the Labour Relations Act.
- 2 Whether the employer could unilaterally revoke its consent to the arbitration process after the initial award was set aside.
- 3 Whether the subsequent dismissals breached the agreement and the court order directing arbitration.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the employer was bound by both the agreement to refer allegations of misconduct to pre-dismissal arbitration under section 188A of the Labour Relations Act and the subsequent court order affirming that agreement. The employer could not unilaterally revoke its consent to the arbitration process, nor could it lawfully revert to internal disciplinary procedures after the initial arbitration award was set aside. The dismissals of the second and third applicants, effected after an internal hearing, constituted a breach of both the agreement and the court order. The court set aside the dismissals and directed that any further enquiry into the alleged misconduct must be...
Court Disposition
Application granted. Dismissals set aside. Employer ordered to comply with agreement and court order regarding pre-dismissal arbitration.
Orders
- The dismissals of the second and third applicants are set aside.
- The first respondent is directed to conduct a pre-dismissal arbitration as contemplated in section 188A of the Labour Relations Act if it elects to pursue the enquiry.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment