South African Transport and Allied Workers Union v Garvis and Others (2580/07) [2010] ZAWCHC 569 (23 November 2010)

South African Transport and Allied Workers Union v Garvis and Others (2580/07) [2010] ZAWCHC 569 (23 November 2010)

The court found that there are reasonable prospects of success on appeal. Accordingly, leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal was granted. The costs of the application are to be costs in the appeal.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2010] ZAWCHC 569
Parties
Applicant: South African Transport and Allied Workers Union; Respondent: Jacqueline Garvis; Respondent: Thuraya Naidoo; Respondent: Chinatown (RSA) International Trading CC; Respondent: Anees Soeker; Respondent: Andrew Njiokwuemegi; Respondent: Dolores Rosanne Reitz; Respondent: Maurice Robertson; Respondent: Harold Burger
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Case Number
2580/07
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal
Outcome
Leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal is granted. Costs are to be costs in the appeal.
Judges
Hlophe JP
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal, Prospects of Success
Civil Procedure Leave to Appeal Prospects of Success

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

South African Transport and Allied Workers Union

Applicant

Jacqueline Garvis

Respondent

Thuraya Naidoo

Respondent

Chinatown (RSA) International Trading CC

Respondent

Anees Soeker

Respondent

Andrew Njiokwuemegi

Respondent

Dolores Rosanne Reitz

Respondent

Maurice Robertson

Respondent

Harold Burger

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether there are reasonable prospects of success on appeal warranting the granting of leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that there are reasonable prospects of success on appeal. Accordingly, leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal was granted. The costs of the application are to be costs in the appeal.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal is granted. Costs are to be costs in the appeal.

Orders

  • Leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal is granted.
  • Costs shall be costs in the appeal.