South African Airways (Pty) Ltd and Air Chefs (Pty) Ltd (77/LM/Oct02) [2002] ZACT 63 (12 November 2002)
The Tribunal found that although the in-flight catering market is highly concentrated at major airports, there are sufficient alternative suppliers and a real threat of entry from niche players and food companies. Entry into the market is not unduly difficult, as demonstrated by recent entrants and the ability to secure premises near airports. The Tribunal accepted that backward integration is common and that a foreclosure strategy would be irrational, as it would increase SAA's own costs. Furthermore, airline customers possess significant countervailing power and can switch suppliers easily, mitigating any potential anti-competitive effects. The merger does not raise public interest...
- Citation
- [2002] ZACT 63
- Parties
- Applicant: South African Airways (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Air Chefs (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 12 November 2002
- Case Number
- 77/LM/Oct02
- Procedural Posture
- Large Merger / Merger Approval
- Outcome
- Merger approved without conditions.
- Judges
- N. Manoim, D. Lewis, U. Bhoola
- Legal Topics
- Vertical Merger, Foreclosure, Barriers to Entry, Countervailing Power, Market Definition
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
South African Airways (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Air Chefs (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Large Merger / Merger Approval
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the vertical merger between SAA and Air Chefs will substantially prevent or lessen competition in the relevant markets.
- 2 Whether the merger will facilitate foreclosure or raise barriers to entry for competitors.
- 3 Whether the transaction raises any public interest concerns.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that although the in-flight catering market is highly concentrated at major airports, there are sufficient alternative suppliers and a real threat of entry from niche players and food companies. Entry into the market is not unduly difficult, as demonstrated by recent entrants and the ability to secure premises near airports. The Tribunal accepted that backward integration is common and that a foreclosure strategy would be irrational, as it would increase SAA's own costs. Furthermore, airline customers possess significant countervailing power and can switch suppliers easily, mitigating any potential anti-competitive effects. The merger does not raise public interest...
Court Disposition
Merger approved without conditions.
Orders
- The merger between South African Airways (Pty) Ltd and Air Chefs (Pty) Ltd is approved unconditionally.
- No public interest concerns arise from the transaction.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment