Southern Sun Hotels Interests (PTY) LTD v South African Commercial Catering and Allied Workers Union (JA136/2021) [2022] ZALAC 120; (2023) 44 ILJ 505 (LAC) (15 November 2022)
The Labour Appeal Court held that the lock-out declared by Southern Sun was unprotected because the issue in dispute—the remuneration for the period 1 April 2020 to 31 March 2021—was regulated by a binding collective agreement. Southern Sun's demand that employees forego the 5.5% wage increase was, in substance, an attempt to vary the terms of the collective agreement, which is prohibited by section 65(3)(a)(i) of the Labour Relations Act. The Court rejected Southern Sun's argument that the dispute was about waiving rights rather than remuneration, finding this to be a mischaracterization. Furthermore, the Court found that the issue could be referred to arbitration or adjudication,...
- Citation
- [2022] ZALAC 120
- Parties
- Appellant: Southern Sun Hotel Interests (PTY) LTD; Respondent: South African Commercial Catering and Allied Workers Union
- Court
- Labour Appeal Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 15 November 2022
- Case Number
- JA136/2021
- Procedural Posture
- Labour Appeal / Appeal Against Labour Court Judgment and Order
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with no order as to costs.
- Judges
- Sutherland, Kathree-Setiloane, Tokota
- Legal Topics
- Lock Out, Collective Agreement, Remuneration Dispute, Protected Strike, Arbitration Rights, Variation of Contract
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Southern Sun Hotel Interests (PTY) LTD
Appellant
South African Commercial Catering and Allied Workers Union
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Labour Appeal / Appeal Against Labour Court Judgment and Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the lock-out declared by Southern Sun was unprotected under section 65(3)(a)(i) of the Labour Relations Act.
- 2 Whether the issue in dispute was regulated by a collective agreement for the relevant period.
- 3 Whether the lock-out was unprotected because the issue could be referred to arbitration or adjudication under section 65(1)(c) of the Labour Relations Act.
Ratio Decidendi
The Labour Appeal Court held that the lock-out declared by Southern Sun was unprotected because the issue in dispute—the remuneration for the period 1 April 2020 to 31 March 2021—was regulated by a binding collective agreement. Southern Sun's demand that employees forego the 5.5% wage increase was, in substance, an attempt to vary the terms of the collective agreement, which is prohibited by section 65(3)(a)(i) of the Labour Relations Act. The Court rejected Southern Sun's argument that the dispute was about waiving rights rather than remuneration, finding this to be a mischaracterization. Furthermore, the Court found that the issue could be referred to arbitration or adjudication,...
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with no order as to costs.
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment