Spar Group Limited and Others v Twelve Gods Supermarket (Pty) Ltd and Others (AR31/2021 and AR32/2021) [2022] ZAKZPHC 29 (7 July 2022)
The Full Court held that Spar had expressly agreed to convene a hearing before terminating the respondents' membership, and that procedural fairness was required. The respondents did not repudiate the agreement to participate in a hearing; their conduct was consistent with seeking a fair process. Spar's failure to hold the hearing and its subsequent termination of membership was invalid and unlawful. The second set of termination notices, purportedly relying on a clause allowing termination without reason, was also invalid because the agreement to hold a hearing encompassed all grounds for termination. Regarding the unilateral amendment of credit terms and limitation of drop-shipment...
- Citation
- [2022] ZAKZPHC 29
- Parties
- Appellant: The Spar Group Limited; Appellant: The Spar Guild of Southern Africa NPC; Appellant: Spar South Africa (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Twelve Gods Supermarket (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Monothendre Trading (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Vamvakou Supermarket (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Trigona Supermarket (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Elena Supermarket (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Eurotas (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Mystra (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Tayegatos Supermarket (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Vresthena (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Melisandre Trading (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Oneiroi (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Parnona (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Zanelainvestments (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Kleomenis Giannacopoulos; Respondent: Christos Giannacopoulos; Respondent: Yianni Giannacopoulos; Respondent: Haralambous Giannacopoulos
- Court
- Kwazulu-Natal High Court, Pietermaritzburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 7 July 2022
- Case Number
- AR31/2021 and AR32/2021
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Full Court Appeal From Orders in Two Related Applications (termination and Drop Shipment)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs, including costs of all senior and junior counsel employed.
- Judges
- Moodley, Radebe, Bezuidenhout
- Legal Topics
- Termination of Membership, Contractual Repudiation, Arbitrio Boni Viri, Credit Facility Variation, Natural Justice, Memorandum of Incorporation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Spar Group Limited
Appellant
The Spar Guild of Southern Africa NPC
Appellant
Spar South Africa (Pty) Ltd
Appellant
Twelve Gods Supermarket (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Monothendre Trading (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Vamvakou Supermarket (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Trigona Supermarket (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Elena Supermarket (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Eurotas (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Mystra (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Tayegatos Supermarket (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Vresthena (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Melisandre Trading (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Oneiroi (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Parnona (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Zanelainvestments (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Kleomenis Giannacopoulos
Respondent
Christos Giannacopoulos
Respondent
Yianni Giannacopoulos
Respondent
Haralambous Giannacopoulos
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Full Court Appeal From Orders in Two Related Applications (termination and Drop Shipment)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the termination of the respondents' membership from the Spar Guild was valid and lawful.
- 2 Whether the respondents repudiated the agreement to participate in a hearing prior to termination.
- 3 Whether Spar's unilateral amendment of credit terms and limitation of drop-shipment supplies was valid and exercised in good faith.
Ratio Decidendi
The Full Court held that Spar had expressly agreed to convene a hearing before terminating the respondents' membership, and that procedural fairness was required. The respondents did not repudiate the agreement to participate in a hearing; their conduct was consistent with seeking a fair process. Spar's failure to hold the hearing and its subsequent termination of membership was invalid and unlawful. The second set of termination notices, purportedly relying on a clause allowing termination without reason, was also invalid because the agreement to hold a hearing encompassed all grounds for termination. Regarding the unilateral amendment of credit terms and limitation of drop-shipment...
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs, including costs of all senior and junior counsel employed.
Orders
- The appeal against the orders of Barnard AJ issued on 17 July 2020 in Case Number 8280/19P and Case Number 9215/19P is dismissed with costs, such costs to include costs of all senior and junior counsel, where so employed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment