Spar Group Limited and Others v Twelve Gods Supermarket (Pty) Ltd and Others (AR31/2021 and AR32/2021) [2022] ZAKZPHC 29 (7 July 2022)

Spar Group Limited and Others v Twelve Gods Supermarket (Pty) Ltd and Others (AR31/2021 and AR32/2021) [2022] ZAKZPHC 29 (7 July 2022)

The Full Court held that Spar had expressly agreed to convene a hearing before terminating the respondents' membership, and that procedural fairness was required. The respondents did not repudiate the agreement to participate in a hearing; their conduct was consistent with seeking a fair process. Spar's failure to hold the hearing and its subsequent termination of membership was invalid and unlawful. The second set of termination notices, purportedly relying on a clause allowing termination without reason, was also invalid because the agreement to hold a hearing encompassed all grounds for termination. Regarding the unilateral amendment of credit terms and limitation of drop-shipment...

Citation
[2022] ZAKZPHC 29
Parties
Appellant: The Spar Group Limited; Appellant: The Spar Guild of Southern Africa NPC; Appellant: Spar South Africa (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Twelve Gods Supermarket (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Monothendre Trading (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Vamvakou Supermarket (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Trigona Supermarket (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Elena Supermarket (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Eurotas (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Mystra (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Tayegatos Supermarket (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Vresthena (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Melisandre Trading (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Oneiroi (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Parnona (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Zanelainvestments (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Kleomenis Giannacopoulos; Respondent: Christos Giannacopoulos; Respondent: Yianni Giannacopoulos; Respondent: Haralambous Giannacopoulos
Court
Kwazulu-Natal High Court, Pietermaritzburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
7 July 2022
Case Number
AR31/2021 and AR32/2021
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Full Court Appeal From Orders in Two Related Applications (termination and Drop Shipment)
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs, including costs of all senior and junior counsel employed.
Judges
Moodley, Radebe, Bezuidenhout
Legal Topics
Termination of Membership, Contractual Repudiation, Arbitrio Boni Viri, Credit Facility Variation, Natural Justice, Memorandum of Incorporation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Spar Group Limited

Appellant

The Spar Guild of Southern Africa NPC

Appellant

Spar South Africa (Pty) Ltd

Appellant

Twelve Gods Supermarket (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Monothendre Trading (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Vamvakou Supermarket (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Trigona Supermarket (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Elena Supermarket (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Eurotas (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Mystra (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Tayegatos Supermarket (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Vresthena (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Melisandre Trading (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Oneiroi (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Parnona (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Zanelainvestments (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Kleomenis Giannacopoulos

Respondent

Christos Giannacopoulos

Respondent

Yianni Giannacopoulos

Respondent

Haralambous Giannacopoulos

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Full Court Appeal From Orders in Two Related Applications (termination and Drop Shipment)

  1. 1 Whether the termination of the respondents' membership from the Spar Guild was valid and lawful.
  2. 2 Whether the respondents repudiated the agreement to participate in a hearing prior to termination.
  3. 3 Whether Spar's unilateral amendment of credit terms and limitation of drop-shipment supplies was valid and exercised in good faith.

Ratio Decidendi

The Full Court held that Spar had expressly agreed to convene a hearing before terminating the respondents' membership, and that procedural fairness was required. The respondents did not repudiate the agreement to participate in a hearing; their conduct was consistent with seeking a fair process. Spar's failure to hold the hearing and its subsequent termination of membership was invalid and unlawful. The second set of termination notices, purportedly relying on a clause allowing termination without reason, was also invalid because the agreement to hold a hearing encompassed all grounds for termination. Regarding the unilateral amendment of credit terms and limitation of drop-shipment...

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs, including costs of all senior and junior counsel employed.

Orders

  • The appeal against the orders of Barnard AJ issued on 17 July 2020 in Case Number 8280/19P and Case Number 9215/19P is dismissed with costs, such costs to include costs of all senior and junior counsel, where so employed.