Spar Group Limited and Others v Twelve Gods Supermarket (Pty) Ltd and Others (1100/2022) [2025] ZASCA 7; 2025 (3) SA 137 (SCA) (30 January 2025)
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the credit facilities agreement between SPAR and the Giannacopoulos Group constituted an ongoing contractual relationship, not a series of discrete offers. The discretion to vary credit terms under clause 5 was subject to the arbitrio boni viri standard, requiring SPAR to act reasonably, honestly, and for a legitimate purpose. The evidence showed that SPAR's reasons for altering the credit and drop shipment terms—alleged financial instability and compliance issues—were not substantiated and did not justify the changes. The timing and nature of the alterations indicated that SPAR's conduct was part of a broader strategy to pressure the respondents out...
- Citation
- [2025] ZASCA 7
- Parties
- Applicant: The Spar Group Limited; Applicant: The Spar Guild of Southern Africa NPC; Applicant: Spar South Africa (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Twelve Gods Supermarket (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Monothendre Trading (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Vamvakou Supermarket (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Trigona Supermarket (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Elena Supermarket (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Eurotas (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Mystra (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Tayegatos Supermarket (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Vresthena (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Melisandre Trading (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Oneiroi (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Parnona (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Zanela Investments (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Kleomenis Giannacopoulos; Respondent: Christos Giannacopoulos; Respondent: Yianni Giannacopoulos; Respondent: Haralambous Giannacopoulos
- Court
- Supreme Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 30 January 2025
- Case Number
- 1100/2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Reconsideration of Special Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for reconsideration of special leave to appeal dismissed with costs, including costs of two counsel where so employed.
- Judges
- Mabindla-Boqwana, Kgoele, Baartman, Dolamo, Masipa
- Legal Topics
- Contractual Discretion, Arbitrio Boni Viri, Variation of Contract, Credit Facilities, Good Faith, Termination of Membership
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Spar Group Limited
Applicant
The Spar Guild of Southern Africa NPC
Applicant
Spar South Africa (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Twelve Gods Supermarket (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Monothendre Trading (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Vamvakou Supermarket (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Trigona Supermarket (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Elena Supermarket (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Eurotas (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Mystra (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Tayegatos Supermarket (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Vresthena (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Melisandre Trading (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Oneiroi (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Parnona (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Zanela Investments (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Kleomenis Giannacopoulos
Respondent
Christos Giannacopoulos
Respondent
Yianni Giannacopoulos
Respondent
Haralambous Giannacopoulos
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Reconsideration of Special Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants' unilateral contractual discretionary power to vary credit terms was subject to the arbitrio boni viri standard.
- 2 Whether SPAR exercised its discretion reasonably, honestly, and for a legitimate purpose when altering credit and drop shipment terms.
- 3 Whether the alteration of credit and drop shipment terms constituted a valid exercise of contractual discretion or was part of a broader strategy to pressure respondents out of their businesses.
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the credit facilities agreement between SPAR and the Giannacopoulos Group constituted an ongoing contractual relationship, not a series of discrete offers. The discretion to vary credit terms under clause 5 was subject to the arbitrio boni viri standard, requiring SPAR to act reasonably, honestly, and for a legitimate purpose. The evidence showed that SPAR's reasons for altering the credit and drop shipment terms—alleged financial instability and compliance issues—were not substantiated and did not justify the changes. The timing and nature of the alterations indicated that SPAR's conduct was part of a broader strategy to pressure the respondents out...
Court Disposition
Application for reconsideration of special leave to appeal dismissed with costs, including costs of two counsel where so employed.
Orders
- The application for reconsideration of the application for special leave is dismissed with costs, such costs to include those of two counsel, where so employed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment