Spar Group Limited and Others v Twelve Gods Supermarket (Pty) Ltd and Others (1100/2022) [2025] ZASCA 7; 2025 (3) SA 137 (SCA) (30 January 2025)

Spar Group Limited and Others v Twelve Gods Supermarket (Pty) Ltd and Others (1100/2022) [2025] ZASCA 7; 2025 (3) SA 137 (SCA) (30 January 2025)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the credit facilities agreement between SPAR and the Giannacopoulos Group constituted an ongoing contractual relationship, not a series of discrete offers. The discretion to vary credit terms under clause 5 was subject to the arbitrio boni viri standard, requiring SPAR to act reasonably, honestly, and for a legitimate purpose. The evidence showed that SPAR's reasons for altering the credit and drop shipment terms—alleged financial instability and compliance issues—were not substantiated and did not justify the changes. The timing and nature of the alterations indicated that SPAR's conduct was part of a broader strategy to pressure the respondents out...

Citation
[2025] ZASCA 7
Parties
Applicant: The Spar Group Limited; Applicant: The Spar Guild of Southern Africa NPC; Applicant: Spar South Africa (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Twelve Gods Supermarket (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Monothendre Trading (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Vamvakou Supermarket (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Trigona Supermarket (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Elena Supermarket (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Eurotas (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Mystra (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Tayegatos Supermarket (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Vresthena (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Melisandre Trading (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Oneiroi (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Parnona (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Zanela Investments (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Kleomenis Giannacopoulos; Respondent: Christos Giannacopoulos; Respondent: Yianni Giannacopoulos; Respondent: Haralambous Giannacopoulos
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
30 January 2025
Case Number
1100/2022
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Reconsideration of Special Leave to Appeal
Outcome
Application for reconsideration of special leave to appeal dismissed with costs, including costs of two counsel where so employed.
Judges
Mabindla-Boqwana, Kgoele, Baartman, Dolamo, Masipa
Legal Topics
Contractual Discretion, Arbitrio Boni Viri, Variation of Contract, Credit Facilities, Good Faith, Termination of Membership

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 17 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Spar Group Limited

Applicant

The Spar Guild of Southern Africa NPC

Applicant

Spar South Africa (Pty) Ltd

Applicant

Twelve Gods Supermarket (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Monothendre Trading (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Vamvakou Supermarket (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Trigona Supermarket (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Elena Supermarket (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Eurotas (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Mystra (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Tayegatos Supermarket (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Vresthena (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Melisandre Trading (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Oneiroi (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Parnona (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Zanela Investments (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Kleomenis Giannacopoulos

Respondent

Christos Giannacopoulos

Respondent

Yianni Giannacopoulos

Respondent

Haralambous Giannacopoulos

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Application for Reconsideration of Special Leave to Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicants' unilateral contractual discretionary power to vary credit terms was subject to the arbitrio boni viri standard.
  2. 2 Whether SPAR exercised its discretion reasonably, honestly, and for a legitimate purpose when altering credit and drop shipment terms.
  3. 3 Whether the alteration of credit and drop shipment terms constituted a valid exercise of contractual discretion or was part of a broader strategy to pressure respondents out of their businesses.

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the credit facilities agreement between SPAR and the Giannacopoulos Group constituted an ongoing contractual relationship, not a series of discrete offers. The discretion to vary credit terms under clause 5 was subject to the arbitrio boni viri standard, requiring SPAR to act reasonably, honestly, and for a legitimate purpose. The evidence showed that SPAR's reasons for altering the credit and drop shipment terms—alleged financial instability and compliance issues—were not substantiated and did not justify the changes. The timing and nature of the alterations indicated that SPAR's conduct was part of a broader strategy to pressure the respondents out...

Court Disposition

Application for reconsideration of special leave to appeal dismissed with costs, including costs of two counsel where so employed.

Orders

  • The application for reconsideration of the application for special leave is dismissed with costs, such costs to include those of two counsel, where so employed.