Special Investigating Unit and Another v LNG Scientific (Pty) Ltd (GP03/2022) [2022] ZAST 15 (29 June 2022)
The Tribunal held that Uniform Rule 53 does not apply to self-review applications brought by organs of State such as the SIU and the MEC: Gauteng Department of Health. The review application was properly brought under Tribunal Rule 10, and the respondents are not obliged to deliver a record of the impugned decision in terms of Uniform Rule 53(1)(b). LNG Scientific (Pty) Ltd is not prejudiced by the procedure adopted, as the respondents have tendered discovery of relevant documents under Tribunal Rule 17(4) read with Uniform Rule 35(13), (1), and (2). The Tribunal specified that discovery should be limited to the record of all information relevant to the impugned decision, excluding...
- Citation
- [2022] ZAST 15
- Parties
- Applicant: Special Investigating Unit; Applicant: MEC: Gauteng Department of Health; Respondent: LNG Scientific (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- Special Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 29 June 2022
- Case Number
- GP03/2022
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Interlocutory Application Regarding Access to Record
- Outcome
- Application dismissed. Costs are costs in the course. Respondents to discover the record of the impugned decision within 20 days, subject to specified exclusions.
- Judges
- L.T. Modiba
- Legal Topics
- Self Review, Discovery in Application Proceedings, Uniform Rule 53, Special Tribunals Act, Access to Record, Costs in Interlocutory Applications
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Special Investigating Unit
Applicant
MEC: Gauteng Department of Health
Applicant
LNG Scientific (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Interlocutory Application Regarding Access to Record
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondents are obliged to deliver a record of the impugned decision in terms of Uniform Rule 53(1)(b).
- 2 Whether the respondents’ tender to discover relevant documents will enable LNG Scientific (Pty) Ltd to properly oppose the review application.
- 3 Determination of costs for the interlocutory application.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal held that Uniform Rule 53 does not apply to self-review applications brought by organs of State such as the SIU and the MEC: Gauteng Department of Health. The review application was properly brought under Tribunal Rule 10, and the respondents are not obliged to deliver a record of the impugned decision in terms of Uniform Rule 53(1)(b). LNG Scientific (Pty) Ltd is not prejudiced by the procedure adopted, as the respondents have tendered discovery of relevant documents under Tribunal Rule 17(4) read with Uniform Rule 35(13), (1), and (2). The Tribunal specified that discovery should be limited to the record of all information relevant to the impugned decision, excluding...
Court Disposition
Application dismissed. Costs are costs in the course. Respondents to discover the record of the impugned decision within 20 days, subject to specified exclusions.
Orders
- The application is dismissed.
- The costs of the application are costs in the course.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment