Special Investigating Unit and Another v Zibani and Others (GP15/2020) [2022] ZAST 10 (4 May 2022)
The Tribunal found, on a balance of probabilities, that Nosipho Zibani masterminded two fraudulent schemes against the office of the State Attorney, aided by the other defendants. In the first scheme, invoices for midwifery medico-legal services were submitted and paid, although no services were rendered. In the second scheme, invoices for assessment services by Ntandokazi Trading were submitted and paid, again without actual services. Forensic and documentary evidence established the flow of funds among the defendants and the lack of legitimate work. The Tribunal held the defendants jointly and severally liable for the damages proved: R135,000 under Claim A and R4,452,351.81 under Claim...
- Citation
- [2022] ZAST 10
- Parties
- Applicant: Special Investigating Unit; Applicant: Member of the Executive Council for Health, Gauteng; Respondent: Nosipho Zibani; Respondent: Yolande Tebogo Hlatshwayo; Respondent: Phindile Anele Zibani; Respondent: Ntandokazi Trading (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- Special Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 4 May 2022
- Case Number
- GP15/2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Trial / Judgment After Default Trial; Defendants Absent
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiffs; defendants held jointly and severally liable for damages and costs; pension benefits forfeited; referral to authorities ordered.
- Judges
- L T Modiba
- Legal Topics
- Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Damages, Default Judgment, Public Sector Corruption, Vicarious Liability, Punitive Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Special Investigating Unit
Applicant
Member of the Executive Council for Health, Gauteng
Applicant
Nosipho Zibani
Respondent
Yolande Tebogo Hlatshwayo
Respondent
Phindile Anele Zibani
Respondent
Ntandokazi Trading (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Judgment After Default Trial; Defendants Absent
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendants perpetrated fraudulent schemes against the Member of the Executive Council for Health, Gauteng.
- 2 Whether the plaintiffs proved, on a balance of probabilities, the damages suffered due to the fraudulent schemes.
- 3 Whether the defendants are jointly and severally liable for the amounts claimed under Claim A and Claim B.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found, on a balance of probabilities, that Nosipho Zibani masterminded two fraudulent schemes against the office of the State Attorney, aided by the other defendants. In the first scheme, invoices for midwifery medico-legal services were submitted and paid, although no services were rendered. In the second scheme, invoices for assessment services by Ntandokazi Trading were submitted and paid, again without actual services. Forensic and documentary evidence established the flow of funds among the defendants and the lack of legitimate work. The Tribunal held the defendants jointly and severally liable for the damages proved: R135,000 under Claim A and R4,452,351.81 under Claim...
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiffs; defendants held jointly and severally liable for damages and costs; pension benefits forfeited; referral to authorities ordered.
Orders
- Leave granted to amend particulars of claim to reflect R4,452,351.81 under Claim B.
- Nosipho Zibani, Yolande Tebogo Hlatshwayo, and Phindile Anele Zibani shall pay the Member of the Executive Council for Health, Gauteng, R135,000 in respect of Claim A, with interest from judgment date; liability joint and several, with Hlatshwayo's liability limited to R34,500 plus interest.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment