Special Investigating Unit v Solidarity obo Walser (JR1305/22) [2025] ZALCJHB 310 (13 July 2025)

Special Investigating Unit v Solidarity obo Walser (JR1305/22) [2025] ZALCJHB 310 (13 July 2025)

The Court found that the applicant failed to provide a compelling and comprehensive explanation for the delay in filing the review application, particularly for the period between 25 May 2022 and 6 June 2022. The reasons advanced, including miscommunication and email issues, were unsupported by evidence and did not cover the entire period of delay. The applicant’s inability to prepare for the arbitration was self-created, as it had ample opportunity to consult with its witnesses and legal representatives. The Commissioner’s refusal to grant a further postponement and to allow witnesses to remain on the virtual platform did not constitute reviewable irregularities, as the applicant had...

Citation
[2025] ZALCJHB 310
Parties
Applicant: Special Investigating Unit; Respondent: Solidarity obo R Walser; Respondent: Seela Mokwena N.O.; Respondent: Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration
Court
Labour Court Johannesburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
13 July 2025
Case Number
JR1305/22
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Condonation Application for Late Filing of Review; Merits of Review Considered
Outcome
Condonation application dismissed; no order as to costs.
Judges
H Schensema
Legal Topics
Condonation, Review of Arbitration Award, Unfair Labour Practice, Postponement Principles, Audi Alteram Partem
Labour Law Civil Procedure Condonation Review of Arbitration Award Unfair Labour Practice Postponement Principles Audi Alteram Partem

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Special Investigating Unit

Applicant

Solidarity obo R Walser

Respondent

Seela Mokwena N.O.

Respondent

Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Review Application / Condonation Application for Late Filing of Review; Merits of Review Considered

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has provided a compelling and comprehensive explanation for the late filing of the review application.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant has demonstrated reasonable prospects of success in the review application.
  3. 3 Whether the Commissioner’s refusal to grant a postponement and to allow witnesses to remain on the virtual platform constitutes a reviewable irregularity.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that the applicant failed to provide a compelling and comprehensive explanation for the delay in filing the review application, particularly for the period between 25 May 2022 and 6 June 2022. The reasons advanced, including miscommunication and email issues, were unsupported by evidence and did not cover the entire period of delay. The applicant’s inability to prepare for the arbitration was self-created, as it had ample opportunity to consult with its witnesses and legal representatives. The Commissioner’s refusal to grant a further postponement and to allow witnesses to remain on the virtual platform did not constitute reviewable irregularities, as the applicant had...

Court Disposition

Condonation application dismissed; no order as to costs.

Orders

  • The condonation application is dismissed.
  • There is no order as to costs.