Sphinx Acrylic Bathroom Ware (Pty) Ltd v Commission for Conciliation, Mediation, and Arbitration and Others (JR865/21) [2024] ZALCJHB 219 (23 May 2024)

Sphinx Acrylic Bathroom Ware (Pty) Ltd v Commission for Conciliation, Mediation, and Arbitration and Others (JR865/21) [2024] ZALCJHB 219 (23 May 2024)

The court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate reasonable prospects of success on appeal. The review application did not raise any arguable legal issue, and there were no compelling reasons for the appeal to be heard. Accordingly, leave to appeal was refused.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] ZALCJHB 219
Parties
Applicant: Sphinx Acrylic Bathroom Ware (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Commission for Conciliation, Mediation, and Arbitration; Respondent: Refiloe Nonyane N.O.; Respondent: Adziambei Victor Ngobeli
Court
Labour Court Johannesburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
23 May 2024
Case Number
JR865/21
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal After Dismissal of Review Application
Outcome
Application for leave to appeal refused.
Judges
M Makhura
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal, Review of Arbitration Award, Prospects of Success
Labour Law Civil Procedure Leave to Appeal Review of Arbitration Award Prospects of Success

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sphinx Acrylic Bathroom Ware (Pty) Ltd

Applicant

Commission for Conciliation, Mediation, and Arbitration

Respondent

Refiloe Nonyane N.O.

Respondent

Adziambei Victor Ngobeli

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal After Dismissal of Review Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has reasonable prospects of success on appeal against the dismissal of its review application.
  2. 2 Whether there are compelling reasons for the appeal to be heard.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate reasonable prospects of success on appeal. The review application did not raise any arguable legal issue, and there were no compelling reasons for the appeal to be heard. Accordingly, leave to appeal was refused.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal refused.

Orders

  • The application for leave to appeal is refused.
  • There is no order as to costs.