Stallenberg v S (RC 37/04) [2009] ZANCHC 25 (8 May 2009)

Stallenberg v S (RC 37/04) [2009] ZANCHC 25 (8 May 2009)

The court held that it was functus officio in relation to the conviction, as leave to appeal had been granted only in respect of sentence. The Vilakazi precedent was distinguishable because, in that case, the record was not before the petition court, whereas in the present matter, the full record and judgment were available and considered when leave was granted. There is no statutory provision or inherent jurisdiction allowing the High Court to consider conviction where leave to appeal was not granted for that aspect. The appellant's remedy lies in petitioning the Supreme Court of Appeal. Since the appellant had already served his sentence and did not pursue the appeal against sentence,...

Citation
[2009] ZANCHC 25
Parties
Appellant: D A Stallenberg; Respondent: The State
Court
Northern Cape High Court, Kimberley
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
8 May 2009
Case Number
RC 37/04
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence Only
Outcome
Appeal struck from the roll as the court is functus officio in relation to the appeal against conviction.
Judges
J I Henriques, S A Majiedt
Legal Topics
Functus Officio, Leave to Appeal, Petition Procedure, Jurisdiction of High Court
Criminal Law Civil Procedure Functus Officio Leave to Appeal Petition Procedure Jurisdiction of High Court

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

D A Stallenberg

Appellant

The State

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence Only

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to hear an appeal against conviction when leave to appeal was granted only in respect of sentence.
  2. 2 Whether the principle of functus officio prevents the court from considering the conviction.
  3. 3 Whether the Vilakazi precedent applies to broaden the scope of the appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that it was functus officio in relation to the conviction, as leave to appeal had been granted only in respect of sentence. The Vilakazi precedent was distinguishable because, in that case, the record was not before the petition court, whereas in the present matter, the full record and judgment were available and considered when leave was granted. There is no statutory provision or inherent jurisdiction allowing the High Court to consider conviction where leave to appeal was not granted for that aspect. The appellant's remedy lies in petitioning the Supreme Court of Appeal. Since the appellant had already served his sentence and did not pursue the appeal against sentence,...

Court Disposition

Appeal struck from the roll as the court is functus officio in relation to the appeal against conviction.

Orders

  • The appeal is struck from the roll as this Court is functus officio in relation to the appeal against conviction.