Steinhoff Africa Holdings (Pty) Ltd and BCM Holdings Limited (Pty) Ltd and Others (35/LM/Apr07) [2007] ZACT 87; [2007] 2 CPLR 426 (CT) (9 November 2007)
The Tribunal found that the proposed merger resulted in both horizontal and vertical integration, but the combined market shares in the relevant markets were not sufficient to raise competition concerns. In the freight forwarding market, the merged entity would hold less than 1% market share, and the market is highly competitive with low barriers to entry. In the bedding components and z-springs markets, Steinhoff's post-merger share would not enable it to exercise portfolio power or exclude rivals, especially as the target firms are not dominant suppliers and significant competitors remain. The Tribunal also considered the related Platoon/PG Bison transaction, which would remove...
- Citation
- [2007] ZACT 87
- Parties
- Applicant: Steinhoff Africa Holdings (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: BCM Holdings Limited (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: International Wire Converters (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Buffalo Freight Systems (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 9 November 2007
- Case Number
- 35/LM/Apr07
- Procedural Posture
- Merger Application / Tribunal Approval With Conditions
- Outcome
- Merger approved subject to condition.
- Judges
- D Lewis, N Manoim, L Reyburn
- Legal Topics
- Horizontal Merger, Vertical Integration, Market Definition, Portfolio Power, Conditional Approval
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Steinhoff Africa Holdings (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
BCM Holdings Limited (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
International Wire Converters (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Buffalo Freight Systems (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Merger Application / Tribunal Approval With Conditions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed merger raises competition concerns in the relevant product and geographic markets.
- 2 Whether the transaction results in anti-competitive horizontal or vertical effects.
- 3 Whether the merger should be approved subject to conditions related to a separate transaction.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the proposed merger resulted in both horizontal and vertical integration, but the combined market shares in the relevant markets were not sufficient to raise competition concerns. In the freight forwarding market, the merged entity would hold less than 1% market share, and the market is highly competitive with low barriers to entry. In the bedding components and z-springs markets, Steinhoff's post-merger share would not enable it to exercise portfolio power or exclude rivals, especially as the target firms are not dominant suppliers and significant competitors remain. The Tribunal also considered the related Platoon/PG Bison transaction, which would remove...
Court Disposition
Merger approved subject to condition.
Orders
- The merger between Steinhoff Africa Holdings (Pty) Ltd and BCM Holdings Limited (Pty) Ltd, International Wire Converters (Pty) Ltd, and Buffalo Freight Systems (Pty) Ltd is approved subject to the implementation of the Platoon/PG Bison transaction.
- No public interest conditions are imposed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment