Download PDF

South Africa Judgment

Competition Tribunal

Stellar Capital Partners Ltd v Friedshelf 1678 (Pty) Ltd (LM208Jan16) [2016] ZACT 12 (25 February 2016)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Tribunal found that there is no overlap between the activities of Stellar Capital Partners Ltd and Cadiz Bidco, as the acquiring group is an investment holding company with interests in various sectors, while the target group specializes in asset management and corporate advisory services. The Commission's investigation confirmed that the transaction would not substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market. Furthermore, the merging parties confirmed that the transaction would not result in any adverse impact on employment, and no other public interest concerns were identified. Accordingly, the Tribunal approved the proposed transaction unconditionally.

Court disposition

The proposed transaction is approved unconditionally.

Orders

  • The merger between Stellar Capital Partners Ltd and Friedshelf 1678 (Pty) Ltd is approved without conditions.

02

Material facts

Parties

Stellar Capital Partners Ltd

Applicant Counsel: Cliffe Dekker Hofrneyr Inc

Friedshelf 1678 (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Amounts and remedies

  • Percentage of Shares Acquired by Stellar Capital Partners Ltd: 39.03
  • Post Merger Shareholding of Stellar Capital Partners Ltd in Cadiz Bidco: 85.02

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Merger Control / Tribunal Approval

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Stellar Capital Partners Ltd argued that acquiring a controlling stake in Cadiz Bidco would allow it to facilitate a turnaround of the Cadiz Group and dispose of non-core assets at attractive values. The transaction would provide Cadiz Group with a single controlling shareholder, enabling management to pursue growth opportunities and achieve a turnaround. The parties confirmed that there would be no adverse impact on employment.
Respondent
The Competition Commission submitted that there is no overlap between the activities of the merging parties. The acquiring group is an investment holding company with interests in various sectors, while the target group specializes in asset management and corporate advisory services. The Commission concluded that the transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition and raises no public interest concerns.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Competition Act 89 of 1998

    A merger may only be prohibited if it is likely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market.

  2. 02

    Competition Act 89 of 1998

    Public interest considerations, including employment effects, must be assessed in merger proceedings.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Tribunal found that there is no overlap between the activities of Stellar Capital Partners Ltd and Cadiz Bidco, as the acquiring group is an investment holding company with interests in various sectors, while the target group specializes in asset management and corporate advisory services. The Commission's investigation confirmed that the transaction would not substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market. Furthermore, the merging parties confirmed that the transaction would not result in any adverse impact on employment, and no other public interest concerns were identified. Accordingly, the Tribunal approved the proposed transaction unconditionally.

Obiter and limits

  • The Tribunal noted that the presence of a single controlling shareholder may assist Cadiz Group management in realizing growth opportunities and achieving a turnaround.
  • No adverse impact on employment was confirmed by the merging parties, and no other public interest concerns were raised.

Court disposition

The proposed transaction is approved unconditionally.

  • The merger between Stellar Capital Partners Ltd and Friedshelf 1678 (Pty) Ltd is approved without conditions.

Source and reliance status

Competition Tribunal

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Competition Tribunal

Judgment

[2016] ZACT 12

COMPETITION

TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA

Case No: LM208Jan16

In the matter between:

STELLAR

CAPITAL PARTNERS

LTD

Primary Acquiring Firm

and

FRIEDSHELF 1678 (PTY)

LTD

Primary Target Firm

Panel

: Yasmin Carrim (Presiding Member)

: Medi Mokuena (Tribunal Member)

: Andiswa Ndoni (Tribunal Member)

Heard on

: 27 January 2016

Order Issued on

: 27 January 2016

Reasons Issued on : 25 February 2016

Reasons for Decision

Approval

[1] On 27 January 2016, the Competition Tribunal ("Tribunal") approved the proposed transaction between Stellar Capital Partners Ltd and Friedshelf 1678 Proprietary Ltd.

[2] The reasons for approving the proposed transaction follow.

Parties to proposed transaction

Primary acquiring firm

[3] The primary acquiring firm is Stellar Capital Partners Ltd ("Stellar Capital'), a company duly incorporated in accordance with the company laws of the Republic of South Africa. It is an investment holding company providing financial services and strategic direction to its investee companies. Stellar Capital already holds 45.99% of the issued share capital of the target firm, Cadiz Bidco.

[4] Stellar Capital also holds strategic non-controlling interests in firms involved in the sale of industrial equipment, mining

rehabilitation services, the information and Communication Technology ("ICT") equipment and solutions sector and asset management services.

Primary target firm

[5] The primary target firm is Friedshelf 1678 (Ply) Ltd also referred to as Cadiz Bidco, a firm duly incorporated in accordance with the company laws of the Republic of South Africa.

[6] The firm is not controlled by any single entity as its shareholding is dispersed. For the sake of completeness the following shareholders hold more than 5% of the issued shares in Cadiz Bidco:

1. Stellar Capital (the acquiring firm) 45.99% 2. Friedshelf 1638 (Ply) Ltd 24.31% 3. Makana Financial Services (Ply) Ltd 14.72% 4. Groombridge Nominees (Ply) Ltd 12.18%

[7] Cadiz Bidco specializes in providing asset management services to institutional investors and big net worth individuals and to a lesser extent corporate advisory services such as merger and acquisition clients. Cadiz Bidco controls a few other companies which together are referred to as Cadiz Bidco.

Proposed transaction and rationale

[8] Stellar Capital intends to acquire a further 39.03% of the issued share capital of Cadiz Bidco. Stellar Capital will achieve this by acquiring 24.31% of the shares held by Friedshelf 1638 (Ply) Ltd and 14.72% of shares held by Makana Financial Services (Ply) Ltd. Following which Stellar Capital will hold 85.02% of the issued share capital of Cadiz Bidco, which will confer it, control of Cadiz Bidco.

[9] Stellar Capital Partners Ltd submits that the proposed transaction will provide it with an opportunity to increase the firm's exposure to an upside in a successful turnaround of Cadiz Group, while simultaneously affording the opportunity to dispose of various non-core assets of [the] Cadiz Group at attractive.

[10] Cadiz Group submits that the proposed transaction will provide it with a single controlling shareholder which will assist its

management to realize growth opportunities and achieve turnaround.

Impact on competition

[11] The Competition Commission ("Commission") found that there is no overlap between the activities of the merging parties. The Acquiring Group is an investment holding company providing financial services and strategic direction to its investee companies. The Acquiring Group holds non-controlling interest in firms involved in industrial equipment, mining rehabilitation services, the ICT equipment, solution sector and asset management services. The Acquiring Group also provides working capital to automotive repair

firms and finances firms looking to acquire critical ICT infrastructure.

[12] The Target Group ("Cadiz Group") specializes in asset management services to institutional investors and high net worth individuals and, to a lesser extent, corporate advisory services, for example to a merger and acquisition clients.

[13] The Commission therefore concluded that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market.

[14] We concurred with the Commission's conclusion that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen

competition in any relevant market.

Public interest

[15] The merging parties. confirmed that the proposed transaction will not result in any adverse impact on employment[1]

[16] The proposed transaction further raises no other public interest concerns.

Conclusion

[17] In light of the above, we concluded that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market. In addition, no public interest issues arise from the proposed transaction. Accordingly, we approved the proposed transaction unconditionally.

25 February 2016

DATE

_____

Ms Yasmin Carrim

Mrs Medi Mokuena and Ms Andiswa Ndoni concurring

Tribunal Researcher:

Busisiwe Masina

For the merging parties: Cliffe Dekker Hofrneyr Inc

For the Commission:

Rakgole Mokole

[1] Inter alia merger record page 3.

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Competition Act 89 of 1998

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.