Steve Tshwete Local Municipality v Miyambu and Others (Application for Leave to Appeal) (002049/2025) [2025] ZALCJHB 103 (3 March 2025)
The court found that the respondents had sufficiently pleaded exceptional circumstances warranting urgency, as they suffered extreme economic hardship while tendering their services at the Municipality's premises. The Municipality's argument regarding alternative contracts and lack of budget was rejected, as section 197 of the LRA unequivocally requires automatic substitution of the new employer for all existing contracts, ensuring continuity of employment. The respondents were entitled to payment of outstanding salaries under section 32(3) of the Basic Conditions of Employment Act. The variation of the original order was permissible under section 165(b) of the LRA and relevant case law,...
- Citation
- [2025] ZALCJHB 103
- Parties
- Applicant: Steve Tshwete Local Municipality; Respondent: Khazamula Samuel Miyambu; Respondent: Joey De Bruin; Respondent: Razia Goolam; Respondent: Busisiwe Nonhlanhla Mashinini
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 3 March 2025
- Case Number
- 002049/2025
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Judgment Delivered on 5 February 2025
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal refused.
- Judges
- Seedat
- Legal Topics
- Section 197 Transfer, Urgent Application, Variation of Order, Arrear Salaries, Basic Conditions of Employment, Leave to Appeal Test
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Steve Tshwete Local Municipality
Applicant
Khazamula Samuel Miyambu
Respondent
Joey De Bruin
Respondent
Razia Goolam
Respondent
Busisiwe Nonhlanhla Mashinini
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Judgment Delivered on 5 February 2025
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the matter was correctly heard on an urgent basis.
- 2 Whether the Municipality breached section 197 of the Labour Relations Act regarding transfer of contracts of employment.
- 3 Whether the respondents were entitled to payment of outstanding salaries for July to December 2024.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the respondents had sufficiently pleaded exceptional circumstances warranting urgency, as they suffered extreme economic hardship while tendering their services at the Municipality's premises. The Municipality's argument regarding alternative contracts and lack of budget was rejected, as section 197 of the LRA unequivocally requires automatic substitution of the new employer for all existing contracts, ensuring continuity of employment. The respondents were entitled to payment of outstanding salaries under section 32(3) of the Basic Conditions of Employment Act. The variation of the original order was permissible under section 165(b) of the LRA and relevant case law,...
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal refused.
Orders
- The application for leave to appeal the judgment of 5 February 2025 is refused.
- There is no order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment