Stewart and Another v Point 2 Point Same Day Express CC and Another (23380/07) [2009] ZAGPJHC 11 (4 May 2009)

Stewart and Another v Point 2 Point Same Day Express CC and Another (23380/07) [2009] ZAGPJHC 11 (4 May 2009)

The court found that Calisse did not have authority to release Stewart from the restraint of trade, as the release was not issued on the official letterhead, lacked statutory compliance, and was not approved by the other member. The circumstances indicated that the release was a stratagem by Calisse and Stewart, and the absence of communication to the second respondent supported the inference of lack of authority. Stewart, given her experience and knowledge of the corporation's internal operations, either knew or ought reasonably to have known that Calisse lacked authority. The dispute of fact regarding authority was not genuine and could be resolved on the papers. The appellants failed...

Citation
[2009] ZAGPJHC 11
Parties
Appellant: Daphne Elizabeth Stewart; Appellant: Network Courier Logistics CC; Respondent: Point 2 Point Same Day Express CC; Respondent: Colette Jacobsen
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
4 May 2009
Case Number
23380/07
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Motion Proceedings; Judgment of Van Rooyen Aj; Leave Granted by Supreme Court of Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Judges
C.J. Claassen, M. Jajbhay, H. Mayat
Legal Topics
Restraint of Trade, Close Corporation Member Authority, Fiduciary Duties, Waiver of Contractual Rights, Dispute of Fact on Affidavit

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Daphne Elizabeth Stewart

Appellant

Network Courier Logistics CC

Appellant

Point 2 Point Same Day Express CC

Respondent

Colette Jacobsen

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Motion Proceedings; Judgment of Van Rooyen Aj; Leave Granted by Supreme Court of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the letter of release from restraint of trade was valid and binding on the first respondent.
  2. 2 Whether Calisse had authority to release Stewart from the restraint of trade on behalf of the close corporation.
  3. 3 Whether Stewart knew or ought reasonably to have known that Calisse lacked authority to issue the release.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that Calisse did not have authority to release Stewart from the restraint of trade, as the release was not issued on the official letterhead, lacked statutory compliance, and was not approved by the other member. The circumstances indicated that the release was a stratagem by Calisse and Stewart, and the absence of communication to the second respondent supported the inference of lack of authority. Stewart, given her experience and knowledge of the corporation's internal operations, either knew or ought reasonably to have known that Calisse lacked authority. The dispute of fact regarding authority was not genuine and could be resolved on the papers. The appellants failed...

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed with costs.