Striving Mind Trading 960 CC v Mabelane and Others (20297/17) [2018] ZAGPPHC 521 (4 July 2018)
The applicant established a clear proprietary right to Erf 347, which was unlawfully interfered with by the first and fourth respondents, who used the property as a playground for the creche and denied access. The PIE Act does not apply because the property is vacant land, not used as a dwelling, and the respondents are not in occupation as contemplated by the Act. The requirements for a final interdict are satisfied: the applicant has a clear right, injury is reasonably apprehended, and no alternative remedy is available. The interests of the children do not require joinder of the MEC or appointment of a curator, as the constitutional issue is not strictly necessary to decide. The...
- Citation
- [2018] ZAGPPHC 521
- Parties
- Applicant: Striving Mind Trading 960 CC; Respondent: Josnia Mabelane; Respondent: Akaal's Property Investments CC; Respondent: City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality; Respondent: The de facto manager of the creche being run from Erf 348, Asiatic Bazaar, PTA
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 4 July 2018
- Case Number
- 20297/17
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Final Judgment on Application for Interdict
- Outcome
- Application granted. Final interdict issued in favour of the applicant.
- Judges
- Ellis
- Legal Topics
- Final Interdict, Proprietary Rights, Unlawful Occupation, Children's Act Partial Care, Prevention of Illegal Eviction Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Striving Mind Trading 960 CC
Applicant
Josnia Mabelane
Respondent
Akaal's Property Investments CC
Respondent
City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality
Respondent
The de facto manager of the creche being run from Erf 348, Asiatic Bazaar, PTA
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Final Judgment on Application for Interdict
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to unfettered and unrestricted access to Erf 347, Asiatic Bazaar, Pretoria.
- 2 Whether the conduct of the first and fourth respondents constitutes unlawful occupation or interference with proprietary rights.
- 3 Whether the Prevention of Illegal Eviction from and Unlawful Occupation of Land Act (PIE Act) applies to the facts.
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant established a clear proprietary right to Erf 347, which was unlawfully interfered with by the first and fourth respondents, who used the property as a playground for the creche and denied access. The PIE Act does not apply because the property is vacant land, not used as a dwelling, and the respondents are not in occupation as contemplated by the Act. The requirements for a final interdict are satisfied: the applicant has a clear right, injury is reasonably apprehended, and no alternative remedy is available. The interests of the children do not require joinder of the MEC or appointment of a curator, as the constitutional issue is not strictly necessary to decide. The...
Court Disposition
Application granted. Final interdict issued in favour of the applicant.
Orders
- It is declared that applicant is entitled to unfettered and unrestricted access to Erf 347, Asiatic Bazaar, Pretoria, Gauteng.
- First and fourth respondents are interdicted and restrained from interfering with the proprietary rights of applicant in respect of the property.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment