Suliman v Road Accident Fund (2019/26898) [2024] ZAGPJHC 506 (23 May 2024)

Suliman v Road Accident Fund (2019/26898) [2024] ZAGPJHC 506 (23 May 2024)

The court found that the case, while significant for the plaintiff, was not out of the ordinary for legal practitioners. The time taken by the plaintiff to consider the Fund's offer was reasonable, and costs should be awarded for 22 and 23 May 2024. The appropriate scale for costs, as per Rule 67A effective from 12 April 2024, is scale B. The plaintiff's request for scale C was not justified given the ordinary nature of the case from a legal perspective.

Citation
[2024] ZAGPJHC 506
Parties
Plaintiff: Bulbulia Suliman; Defendant: Road Accident Fund
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
23 May 2024
Case Number
2019/26898
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Post Settlement Costs Determination
Outcome
The action was settled on the merits and quantum, with costs awarded to the plaintiff on scale B for 22 and 23 May 2024.
Judges
Wright
Legal Topics
Costs Award, Scale of Costs, Settlement Agreement
Civil Procedure Land and Property Costs Award Scale of Costs Settlement Agreement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bulbulia Suliman

Plaintiff

Road Accident Fund

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Trial / Post Settlement Costs Determination

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to costs on scale B or scale C after settlement.
  2. 2 Whether costs for 22 and 23 May 2024 should be awarded to the plaintiff.
  3. 3 Whether the time taken by the plaintiff to consider the Fund's offer was reasonable.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the case, while significant for the plaintiff, was not out of the ordinary for legal practitioners. The time taken by the plaintiff to consider the Fund's offer was reasonable, and costs should be awarded for 22 and 23 May 2024. The appropriate scale for costs, as per Rule 67A effective from 12 April 2024, is scale B. The plaintiff's request for scale C was not justified given the ordinary nature of the case from a legal perspective.

Court Disposition

The action was settled on the merits and quantum, with costs awarded to the plaintiff on scale B for 22 and 23 May 2024.

Orders

  • The settlement agreement is made an order of court.
  • The defendant shall pay the plaintiff R2.9 million for all heads of damages except past hospital and medical expenses, which are postponed by agreement.