Download PDF

South Africa Judgment

Competition Tribunal

Sun Air Limited & Kersaf Investments Limited and Sun International (SA) Holdings (Pty) Ltd / Sun International (SA) Ltd (31/LM/Jul03) [2003] ZACT 44 (26 August 2003)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Tribunal found that the transaction is an internal restructuring within the Kersaf group, involving the acquisition of the remaining shares in SISA Holdings by Sun Air Limited and Kersaf Investments Limited. There is no product overlap, no aggregation of market shares, and no competitor is being removed from the market. The operational structure remains unchanged, and the transaction does not alter the market structure or confer additional market power. The disposal of shares by NWDC is mandated by the National Gambling Act. The Tribunal concluded that the merger does not lead to a substantial lessening of competition and raises no public interest concerns. Accordingly, the merger was approved unconditionally.

Court disposition

Merger approved unconditionally.

Orders

  • The merger between Sun Air Limited, Kersaf Investments Limited, Sun International (SA) Holdings (Pty) Ltd, and Sun International (SA) Ltd is approved without conditions.

02

Material facts

Parties

Sun Air Limited

Applicant Counsel: Edward Nathan Friedland Attorneys

Kersaf Investments Limited

Applicant Counsel: Edward Nathan Friedland Attorneys

Sun International (SA) Holdings (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Sun International (SA) Ltd

Respondent

Amounts and remedies

  • Kersaf Effective Interest in SISA Post Merger (%): 62.2
  • Kersaf Effective Interest in SISA Pre Merger (%): 43.6

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Large Merger / Merger Approval

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicants argued that the transaction is a mere transfer of shareholding resulting in sole control, with no change to the operational structure or market dynamics. They contended that there is no aggregation of market shares or acquisition of market power, and no competitor is being removed from the market. The transaction is driven by NWDC's statutory obligation to dispose of its shareholdings under the National Gambling Act and Kersaf's intention to consolidate its group structure.
Respondent
The Competition Commission agreed that the transaction is an internal restructuring within the Kersaf group, with no product overlap or competitive consequences. The Commission confirmed that the merger does not result in a substantial lessening of competition and raised no public interest concerns.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Competition Act, 1998

    A merger will not be prohibited unless it is likely to substantially prevent or lessen competition, or if public interest concerns are present.

  2. 02

    National Gambling Act, 1996

    Government bodies are required to dispose of investments in certain industries as regulated by statute.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Tribunal found that the transaction is an internal restructuring within the Kersaf group, involving the acquisition of the remaining shares in SISA Holdings by Sun Air Limited and Kersaf Investments Limited. There is no product overlap, no aggregation of market shares, and no competitor is being removed from the market. The operational structure remains unchanged, and the transaction does not alter the market structure or confer additional market power. The disposal of shares by NWDC is mandated by the National Gambling Act. The Tribunal concluded that the merger does not lead to a substantial lessening of competition and raises no public interest concerns. Accordingly, the merger was approved unconditionally.

Obiter and limits

  • The Tribunal noted that the relevant market need not be defined in this instance, as the transaction has no competitive consequences.
  • The parties' rationale for the transaction was driven by statutory requirements and group consolidation, not by market dynamics.

Court disposition

Merger approved unconditionally.

  • The merger between Sun Air Limited, Kersaf Investments Limited, Sun International (SA) Holdings (Pty) Ltd, and Sun International (SA) Ltd is approved without conditions.

Source and reliance status

Competition Tribunal

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Competition Tribunal

Judgment

[2003] ZACT 44

COMPETITION

TRIBUNAL

REPUBLIC

OF SOUTH AFRICA

Case No: 31/LM/Jul03

In the large merger between:

Sun Air Limited & Kersaf Investments Limited

and

Sun International (SA) Holdings (Pty) Ltd & Sun International (SA) Ltd

Reasons for Decision

APPROVAL

On 20 August 2003 the Competition Tribunal issued a Merger Clearance Certificate approving the merger between Sun Air Limited, Kersaf Investments Limited and Sun International (SA) Holdings (Pty) Ltd, Sun International (SA) Ltd in terms of section 16(2)(a). The reasons for the approval of the merger appear below.

The Parties

1. The acquiring firm is Sun Air Limited (“SAL”), a subsidiary of Kersaf Investments Limited (“Kersaf”). SAL is an investment holding company which holds only shares in SISA Holdings. As such, it has no competitors, nor customers.

2. Kersaf is a public company listed on the JSE. It is an investment holding company, having interests in gaming, resorts and casinos both locally and abroad. It also, in conjunction with its subsidiary, Sun International Management Limited (“SIML”), renders some management functions to its group companies which operate resorts or casinos. All the SISA operations in RSA are managed by SIML.

3. Kersaf’s shareholders are: Old Mutual Life Assurance Company (South Africa)(14.68%), Public Investment Commission (7.17%) and Coronation Life (6.48%).

4. Kersaf also directly controls Sun International Travel (Pty) Ltd, Stardust Enterprises and National Casino Resort Manco Holdings (Pty) Ltd. It has indirect control over 30 other companies, which are listed in the papers, and irrelevant for the purposes of this transaction.

The target firms are Sun International (South Africa) Holdings (“SISA Holdings”) and its subsidiary, Sun International (South Africa) Limited (“SISA”).

SISA Holdings is an investment holding company, holding only shares in SISA. SISA is the leading casino, resort and hotel operator in South Africa, with investments in major resorts, gaming complexes and other casinos and hotels. These resorts include Sun City, the Table Bay Hotel in CT, Zimbali Lodge in KZN and the Wild Coast Sun in the Eastern Cape. It is described as an operating and investment holding company, insofar as its holds interests in other operating companies in the gambling, hotels and resorts markets. Its shareholders are as follows:

7. The SISA Group trades through different corporate structures in order to enable regional ownership and Black Economic Empowerment.

The Merger Transaction

8. This transaction entails SAL acquiring the remaining 49.9% of the issued share capital of SISA Holdings from North West Development Corporation (“NWDC”). It already owns 50.1% of the issued share capital of SISA Holdings. Up until now, NWDC and SAL jointly controlled SISA Holdings. With this transaction, the shareholders agreement between SAL and NWDC is being terminated and SAL will thus be the sole shareholder of SISA Holdings and therefore in sole control of this company. The transaction will further give Kersaf indirect control over SISA, which is engaged in the gaming and hospitality industries in South Africa.

9. Taking into account it’s indirect holdings in its various subsidiaries whom themselves have interests in SISA, Kersaf is acquiring an effective 18.6% in SISA, bringing its total effective interest in SISA to 62.2%, up from 43.6% pre-merger.

Rationale for the Transaction

10. NWDC was obliged to dispose of its shareholdings in SISA Holdings in accordance with section 13 of the National Gambling Act, 1996, which regulates the ability of government bodies to retain investments in certain industries.

11. Management and control already vests in Kersaf and it wants to consolidate its group structure by further investing in its core activity of gaming and resorts as well as in SISA assets. NWDC is in judicial management.

The Relevant Market

12. Since the acquiring firms are investment holding companies and SISA operates in the gaming and hotels and casinos market, there is no product overlap. Furthermore we need not define a market since this transaction concerns an acquisition of shares within the Kersaf group with no competitive consequences, therefore no market analysis is required.

Impact on competition

13. The parties contend that this transaction is merely a transfer or acquisition of shareholding and a vesting of sole control. The operational structure of the company will remain intact. We agree that noaggregation of market shares or acquisition of market power is occurring. No competitor is being removed from the market nor is the market structure being altered. is acquiring direct sole control over SISA holdings and Kersaf is acquiring indirect control over SISA.

We accordingly conclude that this merger will not lead to a substantial lessening of competition. There are no public interest concerns which would alter this conclusion. The merger is therefore approved unconditionally.

_____ 26 August 2003

D. Lewis Date

Concurring: N. Manoim, T.Orleyn

For the merging parties: Edward Nathan Friedland Attorneys

For the Commission: L. Blignaut, M. Worsley, Competition Commission

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Competition Act, 1998

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

National Gambling Act, 1996

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.