Supra v Road Accident Fund (910/2016) [2023] ZAFSHC 150 (25 April 2023)

Supra v Road Accident Fund (910/2016) [2023] ZAFSHC 150 (25 April 2023)

The court found that the plaintiff's earning capacity was impaired due to injuries sustained in the motor vehicle accident, which prevented him from continuing his career as a paramedic, especially in overseas war zones where earnings were significantly higher. The evidence established that the plaintiff was qualified and had previously worked as a paramedic in dangerous environments, and his intention to pursue such work remained credible. The court accepted the expert and actuarial evidence supporting the second scenario, which reflected the plaintiff's probable pre-morbid career path and earning potential. The quantum for loss of income was calculated accordingly, with appropriate...

Citation
[2023] ZAFSHC 150
Parties
Plaintiff: Quinton Supra; Defendant: Road Accident Fund
Court
Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
25 April 2023
Case Number
910/2016
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Quantum Determination After Liability Established
Outcome
Plaintiff's claim for past and future loss of income is upheld; defendant ordered to pay R3,692,500 plus costs and interest.
Judges
Molitsoane
Legal Topics
Loss of Earning Capacity, Quantification of Damages, Contingency Deductions, Motor Vehicle Accident, Expert Evidence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 17 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Quinton Supra

Plaintiff

Road Accident Fund

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Trial / Quantum Determination After Liability Established

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff's earning capacity was impaired as a result of the motor vehicle accident.
  2. 2 What is the appropriate quantum for past and future loss of income.
  3. 3 Which pre-morbid career scenario is most probable for calculating damages.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff's earning capacity was impaired due to injuries sustained in the motor vehicle accident, which prevented him from continuing his career as a paramedic, especially in overseas war zones where earnings were significantly higher. The evidence established that the plaintiff was qualified and had previously worked as a paramedic in dangerous environments, and his intention to pursue such work remained credible. The court accepted the expert and actuarial evidence supporting the second scenario, which reflected the plaintiff's probable pre-morbid career path and earning potential. The quantum for loss of income was calculated accordingly, with appropriate...

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's claim for past and future loss of income is upheld; defendant ordered to pay R3,692,500 plus costs and interest.

Orders

  • The defendant is liable for payment to the plaintiff in the sum of R3,692,500 in respect of past and future loss of income resulting from the motor vehicle collision on 16 January 2015.
  • The defendant must pay the plaintiff's taxed or agreed party and party costs, including the reasonable fees and expenses of listed experts and necessary witnesses.