Supra v Road Accident Fund (910/2016) [2023] ZAFSHC 150 (25 April 2023)
The court found that the plaintiff's earning capacity was impaired due to injuries sustained in the motor vehicle accident, which prevented him from continuing his career as a paramedic, especially in overseas war zones where earnings were significantly higher. The evidence established that the plaintiff was qualified and had previously worked as a paramedic in dangerous environments, and his intention to pursue such work remained credible. The court accepted the expert and actuarial evidence supporting the second scenario, which reflected the plaintiff's probable pre-morbid career path and earning potential. The quantum for loss of income was calculated accordingly, with appropriate...
- Citation
- [2023] ZAFSHC 150
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Quinton Supra; Defendant: Road Accident Fund
- Court
- Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 25 April 2023
- Case Number
- 910/2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Trial / Quantum Determination After Liability Established
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's claim for past and future loss of income is upheld; defendant ordered to pay R3,692,500 plus costs and interest.
- Judges
- Molitsoane
- Legal Topics
- Loss of Earning Capacity, Quantification of Damages, Contingency Deductions, Motor Vehicle Accident, Expert Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Quinton Supra
Plaintiff
Road Accident Fund
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Quantum Determination After Liability Established
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff's earning capacity was impaired as a result of the motor vehicle accident.
- 2 What is the appropriate quantum for past and future loss of income.
- 3 Which pre-morbid career scenario is most probable for calculating damages.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiff's earning capacity was impaired due to injuries sustained in the motor vehicle accident, which prevented him from continuing his career as a paramedic, especially in overseas war zones where earnings were significantly higher. The evidence established that the plaintiff was qualified and had previously worked as a paramedic in dangerous environments, and his intention to pursue such work remained credible. The court accepted the expert and actuarial evidence supporting the second scenario, which reflected the plaintiff's probable pre-morbid career path and earning potential. The quantum for loss of income was calculated accordingly, with appropriate...
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's claim for past and future loss of income is upheld; defendant ordered to pay R3,692,500 plus costs and interest.
Orders
- The defendant is liable for payment to the plaintiff in the sum of R3,692,500 in respect of past and future loss of income resulting from the motor vehicle collision on 16 January 2015.
- The defendant must pay the plaintiff's taxed or agreed party and party costs, including the reasonable fees and expenses of listed experts and necessary witnesses.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment