SWD Rugby Voetbal en Ander v Baartman and Others (24939/2009) [2010] ZAWCHC 420 (10 June 2010)

SWD Rugby Voetbal en Ander v Baartman and Others (24939/2009) [2010] ZAWCHC 420 (10 June 2010)

The court found that, after hearing counsel and considering the papers, it was not convinced that there are reasonable prospects of success on appeal or that another court would reach a different conclusion on the grounds relied upon by the applicant. Accordingly, the application for leave to appeal must fail.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2010] ZAWCHC 420
Parties
Applicant: SWD Rugby Voetbal en Een Ander; Respondent: Hennie Baartman; Respondent: John Bruiners; Respondent: Virgio Braaff
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
10 June 2010
Case Number
24939/2009
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal
Outcome
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
Judges
Le Grange, R
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal, Reasonable Prospect of Success, Costs Order
Civil Procedure Leave to Appeal Reasonable Prospect of Success Costs Order

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

SWD Rugby Voetbal en Een Ander

Applicant

Hennie Baartman

Respondent

John Bruiners

Respondent

Virgio Braaff

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has shown reasonable prospects of success on appeal.
  2. 2 Whether another court would come to a different conclusion on the grounds relied upon by the applicant.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that, after hearing counsel and considering the papers, it was not convinced that there are reasonable prospects of success on appeal or that another court would reach a different conclusion on the grounds relied upon by the applicant. Accordingly, the application for leave to appeal must fail.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.