Synergised Engineering Technologies (Pty) Ltd v Bakker and Others (JR205/13) [2016] ZALCJHB 301 (10 August 2016)
The Labour Court held that intervention in uncompleted arbitration proceedings is only justified in exceptional circumstances, such as where grave injustice would result or where the audi alteram partem rule would be violated. In this case, the Commissioner exercised her discretion to exclude evidence relating to Bakker's conduct prior to the commencement of the latest contract, finding it irrelevant to the fairness of the dismissal under the current contract. The Court found no basis to conclude that the Commissioner's ruling would result in grave injustice or prevent a fair trial of the issues. The ruling was not irrational or unreasonable given the material before the Commissioner, and...
- Citation
- [2016] ZALCJHB 301
- Parties
- Applicant: Synergised Engineering Technologies (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Jan Dirk Bakker; Respondent: Commissioner Mapalo Tsatsimpe; Respondent: The Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 10 August 2016
- Case Number
- JR205/13
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment on Review of in Limine Arbitration Ruling
- Outcome
- Application to review and set aside the in limine ruling is dismissed. The dispute is to be re-scheduled for arbitration before a Commissioner other than the Second Respondent. The applicant is ordered to pay the costs of the application.
- Judges
- Tlhotlhalemaje
- Legal Topics
- Relevance of Evidence, Unfair Dismissal, Arbitration Procedure, Third Party Influence on Dismissal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Synergised Engineering Technologies (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Jan Dirk Bakker
Respondent
Commissioner Mapalo Tsatsimpe
Respondent
The Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment on Review of in Limine Arbitration Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Labour Court should intervene in an uncompleted arbitration to review an in limine ruling on admissibility of evidence.
- 2 Whether evidence relating to the employee's conduct prior to the commencement of the latest employment contract is relevant to the fairness of the dismissal.
- 3 Whether the Commissioner exercised her discretion fairly in excluding evidence predating the contract.
Ratio Decidendi
The Labour Court held that intervention in uncompleted arbitration proceedings is only justified in exceptional circumstances, such as where grave injustice would result or where the audi alteram partem rule would be violated. In this case, the Commissioner exercised her discretion to exclude evidence relating to Bakker's conduct prior to the commencement of the latest contract, finding it irrelevant to the fairness of the dismissal under the current contract. The Court found no basis to conclude that the Commissioner's ruling would result in grave injustice or prevent a fair trial of the issues. The ruling was not irrational or unreasonable given the material before the Commissioner, and...
Court Disposition
Application to review and set aside the in limine ruling is dismissed. The dispute is to be re-scheduled for arbitration before a Commissioner other than the Second Respondent. The applicant is ordered to pay the costs of the application.
Orders
- The application to review and set aside the in limine ruling of the Second Respondent is dismissed.
- The dispute between the parties is to be re-scheduled for arbitration before a Commissioner other than the Second Respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment