Take v S (A112/2017) [2017] ZAFSHC 197 (17 November 2017)

Take v S (A112/2017) [2017] ZAFSHC 197 (17 November 2017)

The court found that the complainant's evidence was compromised by her intoxication and inability to recall key details, resulting in contradictions regarding the circumstances of the alleged rape. The medical evidence did not conclusively support penetration, and DNA results were negative. The appellant's version, that no sexual intercourse occurred due to the complainant's menstrual cycle and both parties' intoxication, was found to be reasonably possibly true and supported by the medical report. Consequently, the conviction for rape could not be sustained. However, the complainant's injuries were consistent with her account of being assaulted by the appellant, and the court found that...

Citation
[2017] ZAFSHC 197
Parties
Appellant: Phaladi Lazarus Take; Respondent: The State
Court
Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
17 November 2017
Case Number
A112/2017
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Outcome
Appeal upheld; conviction and sentence for rape set aside; appellant convicted of assault with intent to do grievous bodily harm and sentenced to twelve months imprisonment, half suspended for three years.
Judges
Mathebula, Phalatsi
Legal Topics
Rape, Single Witness Rule, Assault With Intent to Do Grievous Bodily Harm, Evidence Evaluation, Sentence Suspension
Criminal Law Rape Single Witness Rule Assault With Intent to Do Grievous Bodily Harm Evidence Evaluation Sentence Suspension

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Phaladi Lazarus Take

Appellant

The State

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the conviction for rape was sustainable on the evidence presented.
  2. 2 Whether the complainant's testimony as a single witness was clear and satisfactory.
  3. 3 Whether the appellant's version was reasonably possibly true.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the complainant's evidence was compromised by her intoxication and inability to recall key details, resulting in contradictions regarding the circumstances of the alleged rape. The medical evidence did not conclusively support penetration, and DNA results were negative. The appellant's version, that no sexual intercourse occurred due to the complainant's menstrual cycle and both parties' intoxication, was found to be reasonably possibly true and supported by the medical report. Consequently, the conviction for rape could not be sustained. However, the complainant's injuries were consistent with her account of being assaulted by the appellant, and the court found that...

Court Disposition

Appeal upheld; conviction and sentence for rape set aside; appellant convicted of assault with intent to do grievous bodily harm and sentenced to twelve months imprisonment, half suspended for three years.

Orders

  • The appeal is upheld.
  • The conviction and sentence for rape are set aside.