Tasima (Pty) Ltd v Road Traffic Management Corporation and Others (J890/17) [2017] ZALCJHB 368 (11 October 2017)

Tasima (Pty) Ltd v Road Traffic Management Corporation and Others (J890/17) [2017] ZALCJHB 368 (11 October 2017)

The court found that the applicant's written submissions were filed only one day late and that condonation should be granted as the delay was minimal and did not prejudice the respondents. However, the court determined that there were no reasonable prospects of success on appeal and therefore dismissed the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] ZALCJHB 368
Parties
Applicant: Tasima (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Road Traffic Management Corporation; Respondent: Department of Transport; Respondent: Director General: Department of Transport; Respondent: Minister of Transport; Respondent: All employees listed in Annexure “A” to the Notice of Motion; Respondent: Makhosini Msibi
Court
Labour Court Johannesburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Case Number
J 890/17
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal and Condonation
Outcome
Application for condonation granted; application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
Judges
H Rabkin-Naicker
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal, Condonation, Late Filing, Costs Award
Labour Law Leave to Appeal Condonation Late Filing Costs Award

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Tasima (Pty) Ltd

Applicant

Road Traffic Management Corporation

Respondent

Department of Transport

Respondent

Director General: Department of Transport

Respondent

Minister of Transport

Respondent

All employees listed in Annexure “A” to the Notice of Motion

Respondent

Makhosini Msibi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal and Condonation

  1. 1 Whether condonation should be granted for the late filing of written submissions.
  2. 2 Whether leave to appeal should be granted in light of the prospects of success.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant's written submissions were filed only one day late and that condonation should be granted as the delay was minimal and did not prejudice the respondents. However, the court determined that there were no reasonable prospects of success on appeal and therefore dismissed the application for leave to appeal. Costs were awarded against the applicant, including the costs of one counsel.

Court Disposition

Application for condonation granted; application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • The application for condonation for the late filing of the written submissions is granted with no order as to costs.
  • The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs, including the costs of one counsel.