TE Connectivity Solutions GMBH v TIS Invest (Pty) Ltd (2019/28318) [2021] ZAGPJHC 415 (10 September 2021)
The applicant established its status as a creditor and the quantum of the debt owed by the respondent, which was not disputed on bona fide or reasonable grounds. The respondent's financial position, as evidenced by its retained income deficit and sustained trading losses, demonstrates both factual and commercial insolvency. The respondent's conduct, including the diversion of assets and failure to pay creditors, further supports the conclusion that it is unable to pay its debts. The application for postponement was refused as the respondent had ample opportunity to address the Report and had already placed relevant financial information before the court. The respondent's opposition was...
- Citation
- [2021] ZAGPJHC 415
- Parties
- Applicant: TE Connectivity Solutions GMBH; Respondent: TIS Invest (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 10 September 2021
- Case Number
- 2019/28318
- Procedural Posture
- Winding Up Application / Final Order
- Outcome
- Final winding-up order granted against the respondent.
- Judges
- Weiner
- Legal Topics
- Winding Up of Company, Commercial Insolvency, Creditor Rights, Companies Act 1973, Business Rescue
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
TE Connectivity Solutions GMBH
Applicant
TIS Invest (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Winding Up Application / Final Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent is commercially insolvent and unable to pay its debts.
- 2 Whether the applicant has established its status as a creditor and the quantum of the debt.
- 3 Whether the respondent has raised a bona fide and reasonable dispute regarding the indebtedness.
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant established its status as a creditor and the quantum of the debt owed by the respondent, which was not disputed on bona fide or reasonable grounds. The respondent's financial position, as evidenced by its retained income deficit and sustained trading losses, demonstrates both factual and commercial insolvency. The respondent's conduct, including the diversion of assets and failure to pay creditors, further supports the conclusion that it is unable to pay its debts. The application for postponement was refused as the respondent had ample opportunity to address the Report and had already placed relevant financial information before the court. The respondent's opposition was...
Court Disposition
Final winding-up order granted against the respondent.
Orders
- The respondent is placed under final winding-up in the hands of the Master of the High Court.
- The costs of this application are to be costs in the winding-up.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment