Telkom SA Ltd and Another and Praysa Trade 1062 (Pty) Ltd (81/LM/Aug00) [2000] ZACT 43 (6 October 2000)
The Tribunal found that the merger does not result in a substantial lessening or prevention of competition in either the property or facilities management services markets. The transaction expands market reach rather than shifting market share, and the exclusive arrangements apply only to TFMC, not its shareholders, who remain free to compete. The Tribunal rejected Infracom's arguments regarding anti-competitive conduct and essential facility doctrine, noting that replacing one exclusive contract with another does not affect competition. The Tribunal also determined that employment concerns were adequately addressed by the inclusion of a 20-month no-retrenchment clause for transferred...
- Citation
- [2000] ZACT 43
- Parties
- Applicant: Telkom SA Ltd; Applicant: TPI Investments; Applicant: Praysa Trade 1062 (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Communications Workers Union (CWU); Respondent: Infracom (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 6 October 2000
- Case Number
- 81/LM/Aug00
- Procedural Posture
- Large Merger / Approval With Conditions
- Outcome
- Merger approved subject to conditions protecting employment and enforceability of employee rights.
- Judges
- D. H. Lewis, N.M. Manoim, P. Maponya
- Legal Topics
- Large Merger Review, Exclusive Dealing, Public Interest Employment, Essential Facility Doctrine, Outsourcing, Employee Protection
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Telkom SA Ltd
Applicant
TPI Investments
Applicant
Praysa Trade 1062 (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Communications Workers Union (CWU)
Respondent
Infracom (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Large Merger / Approval With Conditions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the merger between Telkom SA Ltd, TPI Investments, and Praysa Trade 1062 (Pty) Ltd substantially lessens or prevents competition in the relevant markets.
- 2 Whether the exclusive facilities management agreement between Telkom and TFMC constitutes an anti-competitive restrictive practice.
- 3 Whether the merger adversely affects employment and public interest considerations under the Competition Act.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the merger does not result in a substantial lessening or prevention of competition in either the property or facilities management services markets. The transaction expands market reach rather than shifting market share, and the exclusive arrangements apply only to TFMC, not its shareholders, who remain free to compete. The Tribunal rejected Infracom's arguments regarding anti-competitive conduct and essential facility doctrine, noting that replacing one exclusive contract with another does not affect competition. The Tribunal also determined that employment concerns were adequately addressed by the inclusion of a 20-month no-retrenchment clause for transferred...
Court Disposition
Merger approved subject to conditions protecting employment and enforceability of employee rights.
Orders
- TFMC must not retrench any employee transferred from Telkom SA Ltd as part of this transaction for a period of twenty (20) months from the effective date of the merger.
- During the 20-month period, the employment protection obligation must be enforceable by each transferred employee against TFMC and, if necessary, against its shareholders Rebserve Ltd and WS Atkins International Ltd.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment