Temo v Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa (2021/44430) [2025] ZAGPPHC 736 (21 July 2025)

Temo v Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa (2021/44430) [2025] ZAGPPHC 736 (21 July 2025)

The court found that the plaintiff did not suffer a fracture as originally claimed, but only soft tissue injuries to the left knee and ankle. The expert evidence relied largely on the plaintiff's version and lacked objective corroboration. The plaintiff failed to prove that his spondylosis was caused by the accident, and there was no reliable evidence of permanent disability or loss of earning capacity. The actuarial report was based on incorrect assumptions regarding salary scales. The court accepted the defendant's evidence that the plaintiff had not been accommodated for physical difficulties until April 2025 and had not suffered patrimonial loss. The plaintiff was entitled only to...

Citation
[2025] ZAGPPHC 736
Parties
Plaintiff: Marotola Bernard Temo; Defendant: Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
21 July 2025
Case Number
2021/44430
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Judgment After Trial
Outcome
Plaintiff partially succeeds; awarded damages for future medical expenses and general damages only.
Judges
Swanepoel
Legal Topics
Personal Injury, Quantification of Damages, Expert Evidence, Loss of Earning Capacity
Delict Civil Procedure Personal Injury Quantification of Damages Expert Evidence Loss of Earning Capacity

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Marotola Bernard Temo

Plaintiff

Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Trial / Judgment After Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff suffered injuries as alleged and the extent thereof.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff proved patrimonial loss due to loss of earning capacity.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to damages for future medical expenses and general damages.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff did not suffer a fracture as originally claimed, but only soft tissue injuries to the left knee and ankle. The expert evidence relied largely on the plaintiff's version and lacked objective corroboration. The plaintiff failed to prove that his spondylosis was caused by the accident, and there was no reliable evidence of permanent disability or loss of earning capacity. The actuarial report was based on incorrect assumptions regarding salary scales. The court accepted the defendant's evidence that the plaintiff had not been accommodated for physical difficulties until April 2025 and had not suffered patrimonial loss. The plaintiff was entitled only to...

Court Disposition

Plaintiff partially succeeds; awarded damages for future medical expenses and general damages only.

Orders

  • The defendant shall pay the plaintiff R 285 000 in respect of general damages and future medical expenses.
  • The defendant shall pay interest on the aforesaid amount calculated from 14 days after this judgment, at the applicable interest rate, a tempore morae.