Terblanche and Another v South African Express Airways SOC and Others (10046/2020) [2020] ZAGPJHC 110 (29 April 2020)

Terblanche and Another v South African Express Airways SOC and Others (10046/2020) [2020] ZAGPJHC 110 (29 April 2020)

The court found that the applicants had exhausted all reasonable avenues to secure post-commencement finance, including approaching banks and the sole shareholder, but were unsuccessful. With no income, escalating debts exceeding R5 billion, and grounded aircraft, the continuation of business rescue was not feasible. The court accepted that service by email was sufficient under the urgent circumstances, as all affected persons were made aware of the proceedings and no opposition was filed. The requirements of Section 141(2) of the Companies Act were satisfied, and the court granted the order for discontinuation of business rescue and provisional liquidation of the first respondent.

Citation
[2020] ZAGPJHC 110
Parties
Applicant: Daniel Terblanche; Applicant: Phahlani Mkhobo; Respondent: South African Express Airways SOC Limited; Respondent: Companies and Intellectual Property Commission; Respondent: Affected persons of South African Express Airways SOC Limited
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
29 April 2020
Case Number
10046/2020
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Application for Discontinuation of Business Rescue and Provisional Liquidation
Outcome
Application granted. Business rescue proceedings discontinued and first respondent placed in provisional liquidation.
Judges
Twala M L
Legal Topics
Business Rescue, Liquidation, Service of Process, Companies Act 71 of 2008
Commercial and Corporate Civil Procedure Business Rescue Liquidation Service of Process Companies Act 71 of 2008

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Daniel Terblanche

Applicant

Phahlani Mkhobo

Applicant

South African Express Airways SOC Limited

Respondent

Companies and Intellectual Property Commission

Respondent

Affected persons of South African Express Airways SOC Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Urgent Application / Application for Discontinuation of Business Rescue and Provisional Liquidation

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the business rescue proceedings of the first respondent should be discontinued and the company placed in provisional liquidation.
  2. 2 Whether service of the application on affected persons was adequate given the urgency and practical constraints.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants had exhausted all reasonable avenues to secure post-commencement finance, including approaching banks and the sole shareholder, but were unsuccessful. With no income, escalating debts exceeding R5 billion, and grounded aircraft, the continuation of business rescue was not feasible. The court accepted that service by email was sufficient under the urgent circumstances, as all affected persons were made aware of the proceedings and no opposition was filed. The requirements of Section 141(2) of the Companies Act were satisfied, and the court granted the order for discontinuation of business rescue and provisional liquidation of the first respondent.

Court Disposition

Application granted. Business rescue proceedings discontinued and first respondent placed in provisional liquidation.

Orders

  • The draft order as amended annexed hereto marked 'X' is made an order of court.