Thabzo Security Services CC v Msunduzi Municipality and Others (2682/23P) [2023] ZAKZPHC 122 (24 October 2023)
The court found that the applicant's bid was non-responsive due to its failure to submit the mandatory audited financial statements required by the tender invitation. The Bid Evaluation Committee and Bid Adjudication Committee had no discretion to condone non-compliance with pre-qualification criteria. The contract awarded to the applicant was invalid from inception as it was concluded in breach of statutory and constitutional procurement requirements. The Municipality was entitled to raise a reactive challenge to the validity of the contract in response to the applicant's enforcement proceedings, even though it had not yet applied for self-review. The applicant failed to establish a...
- Citation
- [2023] ZAKZPHC 122
- Parties
- Applicant: Thabzo Security Services CC; Respondent: Msunduzi Municipality; Respondent: Wise Security Training CC; Respondent: Royal Security CC
- Court
- Kwazulu-Natal High Court, Pietermaritzburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 24 October 2023
- Case Number
- 2682/23P
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Opposed Motion for Interim Interdict and Joinder, Pending Review
- Outcome
- Applications for interim interdictory relief dismissed with costs on an attorney and own client scale, including costs of two counsel where employed and all costs previously reserved.
- Judges
- Annandale AJ
- Legal Topics
- Public Procurement, Collateral Challenge, Interim Interdict, Municipal Finance Management Act, Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Thabzo Security Services CC
Applicant
Msunduzi Municipality
Respondent
Wise Security Training CC
Respondent
Royal Security CC
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Opposed Motion for Interim Interdict and Joinder, Pending Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant's bid was non-responsive due to failure to submit mandatory audited financial statements.
- 2 Whether the Municipality had a contractual or public law right to cancel the service level agreement after awarding the tender.
- 3 Whether the Municipality could raise a reactive challenge to the validity of the contract without a formal self-review application.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant's bid was non-responsive due to its failure to submit the mandatory audited financial statements required by the tender invitation. The Bid Evaluation Committee and Bid Adjudication Committee had no discretion to condone non-compliance with pre-qualification criteria. The contract awarded to the applicant was invalid from inception as it was concluded in breach of statutory and constitutional procurement requirements. The Municipality was entitled to raise a reactive challenge to the validity of the contract in response to the applicant's enforcement proceedings, even though it had not yet applied for self-review. The applicant failed to establish a...
Court Disposition
Applications for interim interdictory relief dismissed with costs on an attorney and own client scale, including costs of two counsel where employed and all costs previously reserved.
Orders
- The application under Notice of Motion dated 21 February 2023 and the application under Notice of Motion dated 4 April 2023 are dismissed with costs on the scale as between attorney and own client, such costs to include those of two counsel where so employed and all costs previously reserved.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment