Thandisile Business Services (Pty) Ltd v Department of Home Affairs and Others (2025-035879) [2025] ZAGPPHC 397 (16 April 2025)

Thandisile Business Services (Pty) Ltd v Department of Home Affairs and Others (2025-035879) [2025] ZAGPPHC 397 (16 April 2025)

The court found that the applicant had multiple opportunities to address the issue of missing documentation with the first respondent, either immediately after the invitation to bid or at the briefing session. The applicant's decision not to attend the briefing session and to wait until after the tender was awarded...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] ZAGPPHC 397
Parties
Applicant: Thandisile Business Services (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Department of Home Affairs; Respondent: Livhuwani Tommy Makhode N.O.; Respondent: Kusile Facilities Management
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Case Number
2025-035879
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Application to Strike From Roll for Lack of Urgency
Outcome
Application struck from the roll for lack of urgency; no order as to costs.
Judges
MPN Mbongwe
Legal Topics
Urgency in Applications, Tender Review, Self Created Urgency
Civil Procedure Administrative Law Urgency in Applications Tender Review Self Created Urgency

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Thandisile Business Services (Pty) Ltd

Applicant

Department of Home Affairs

Respondent

Livhuwani Tommy Makhode N.O.

Respondent

Kusile Facilities Management

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Urgent Application / Application to Strike From Roll for Lack of Urgency

  1. 1 Whether the application is urgent and should be heard as such.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant's conduct resulted in self-created urgency.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant was entitled to review the tender process at this stage.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had multiple opportunities to address the issue of missing documentation with the first respondent, either immediately after the invitation to bid or at the briefing session. The applicant's decision not to attend the briefing session and to wait until after the tender was awarded to seek relief constituted self-created urgency. The court held that the applicant failed to act promptly and that the urgency claimed was not genuine but rather a consequence of its own conduct. Accordingly, the matter was not urgent and was struck from the roll.

Court Disposition

Application struck from the roll for lack of urgency; no order as to costs.

Orders

  • The matter is struck from the roll for lack of urgency.
  • No order is made as to costs.