Download PDF

South Africa Judgment

Competition Tribunal

Thebe Investment Corporation (Pty) Ltd v Pride Milling Company (Pty) Ltd (LM208Nov18) [2019] ZACT 13 (27 February 2019)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Tribunal found that the proposed transaction would not result in a horizontal overlap, as the parties operate in distinct segments of the agricultural sector. The vertical integration between Pride Milling and Compass Group, facilitated by Thebe's stake in Compass, would not substantially lessen or prevent competition in the relevant market. The Commission's investigation confirmed that neither Thebe Group nor Compass Group are significant customers for maize products, and competitors did not raise concerns. The transaction would improve Pride Milling's BEE status and have no adverse effect on employment. No other public interest concerns were identified. Accordingly, the Tribunal concluded that the transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition and raises no public interest issues.

Court disposition

The proposed transaction is approved unconditionally.

Orders

  • The merger between Thebe Investment Corporation (Pty) Ltd and Pride Milling Company (Pty) Ltd is approved without conditions.

02

Material facts

Parties

Thebe Investment Corporation (Pty) Ltd

Applicant Counsel: Mr Jim Motlanthe

Pride Milling Company (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Amounts and remedies

  • Percentage of Shares Acquired: 30

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Merger Control / Approval

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Thebe Investment Corporation argued that acquiring a 30% stake in Pride Milling would result in a black-controlled entity, transforming the white maize milling and processing sector. The transaction aims to improve Pride Milling's BEE status and facilitate further expansion and shareholder value. The merging parties confirmed that there would be no adverse effect on employment.
Respondent
The Competition Commission submitted that the transaction would not result in a horizontal overlap, as Pride Milling is only involved in manufacturing and distributing milled maize products, while Thebe's agricultural activities are limited to fresh produce distribution. The Commission found that the vertical integration with Compass Group would not substantially lessen competition, and competitors did not identify Thebe or Compass as significant customers. No public interest concerns were raised.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998

    A merger may only be prohibited if it is likely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market.

  2. 02

    Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998

    Public interest considerations, including employment and transformation, must be assessed in merger proceedings.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Tribunal found that the proposed transaction would not result in a horizontal overlap, as the parties operate in distinct segments of the agricultural sector. The vertical integration between Pride Milling and Compass Group, facilitated by Thebe's stake in Compass, would not substantially lessen or prevent competition in the relevant market. The Commission's investigation confirmed that neither Thebe Group nor Compass Group are significant customers for maize products, and competitors did not raise concerns. The transaction would improve Pride Milling's BEE status and have no adverse effect on employment. No other public interest concerns were identified. Accordingly, the Tribunal concluded that the transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition and raises no public interest issues.

Obiter and limits

  • The Tribunal noted the importance of transformation in the maize milling sector and welcomed the transaction's contribution to Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment.
  • The Tribunal acknowledged the merging parties' commitment to maintaining employment levels post-transaction.

Court disposition

The proposed transaction is approved unconditionally.

  • The merger between Thebe Investment Corporation (Pty) Ltd and Pride Milling Company (Pty) Ltd is approved without conditions.

Source and reliance status

Competition Tribunal

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Competition Tribunal

Judgment

[2019] ZACT 13

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA

Case No:LM208Nov18

In the matter between:

Thebe Investment Corporation (Pty) Ltd

Primary Acquiring Firm

And

Pride Milling Company (Pty) Ltd

Primary Target Firm

Panel

Yasmin Carrim (Presiding Member)

Mondo Mazwai (Tribunal Member)

Fiona Tregenna (Tribunal Member)

Heard on

30 January 2019

Order Issued on 30 January 2019

Reasons Issued on 27 February 2019

Reasons for Decision

Approval

[1] On 30 January 2019, the Competition Tribunal ("Tribunal") unconditionally approved the transaction involving Thebe Investment

Corporation (Pty) Ltd and Pride Milling Company (Pty) Ltd.

[2] The reasons for approving the proposed transaction follow.

Parties to the proposed transaction

Primary acquiring firm

[3] The primary acquiring firm is Thebe Investment Corporation (Pty) Ltd ("Thebe"), a firm incorporated in accordance with the laws of the Republic of South Africa.

[4] Thebe is jointly controlled by Batho Batho Trust, Main Street 1485 (Pty) Ltd, Main Street 1547 {Pty) Ltd, Sanlam Life Insurance Ltd and Umhlomulo Equity Participation (Pty) Ltd.

[5] Thebe is an investment holding company that has investments mainly in tourism, mining resources, infrastructure, renewable energy,

petrochemicals, telecommunications, financial services and healthcare.

[6] Of relevance to the proposed transaction is the Thebe Group's interest in Compass Food Group which provides a variety of food catering

services which utilise the maize products manufactured and distributed by Pride.

Primary target firm

[7] The primary target firm is Pride Milling Company (Pty) Ltd ("Pride Milling"), a company incorporated in terms of the company laws of South Africa.

[8] Pride Milling is jointly controlled by Mr CJP Jordaan and Mr JA Bothma who hold 73% and 27% shares respectively. Pride Milling does not control any firm.

Proposed transaction and rationale

[9] In terms of the proposed transaction, Thebe Group intends to acquire 30% of the issued share capital in Pride currently held between Mr Jordan and Mr Bothma. Upon implementation of the proposed transaction, Pride will jointly be controlled by the Thebe Group.

. According to the Acquiring Firm, the objective is to have a black controlled company that will be positioned to transform the white maize milling and processing sector by being the only transformed business in the sector.

[10] Pride Milling is entering into the proposed transaction to improve its Broad­ Based Black Economic Empowerment ("BEE") status.[1]

Impact on competition

[11] The Commission considered the activities of the merging parties and found that the proposed transaction would not result in a horizontal

overlap as Pride's activities are limited to the manufacturing and distribution of milled maize products in South Africa. Although the Thebe Group has activities in the agricultural sector, these pertain to the distribution of fresh produce and not in the manufacture and distribution of milled maize product.

[12] The Commission also found that the proposed transaction would result in the vertical integration of Pride Milling and Compass Group. This is because Thebe Group currently holds a non-controlling 41% stake in the Compass Group which provides catering services in Gauteng. Thus, from a competition law point of view, Pride Milling will be in a position to supply maize products to Compass Group. However, such vertical integration will not have the effect of substantially lessening or preventing competition in the relevant market.

[13] Furthermore, the Commission submits that none of the competitors of Pride identified the Thebe Group or Compass Group as a significant customer in respect of the procurement of maize products.

[14] Given the above, the Commission concluded that the proposed transaction is· unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any

relevant market in South Africa.

Public Interest

[15] The merging parties confirmed that the proposed transaction will have no adverse effect on employment in South Africa.[2]

[16] The proposed transaction raises no other public Interest concerns.

Conclusion

[17] In light of the above, we concluded that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market. In addition, no public interest issues arise from the proposed transaction. Accordingly, we approved the proposed transaction unconditionally.

Ms Yasmin Carrim

Mondo Mazwai and Prof Imraan Valodia concurring

27 February 2019

DATE

Tribunal Case Manager : Ms Busisiwe Masina

For the merging parties : Mr Jim Motlanthe Mkhabela Huntley Attorneys

For the Commission : Mr Tumiso Loate

[1] To have a strategic partner in Thebe for further expansion and to unblock value for shareholders.

[2] Merger Record, pages 17

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.