Thendele and Another Legal Practice Council and Others (10641/2020) [2022] ZAGPPHC 170 (28 March 2022)
The court held that section 112(2) of the Legal Practice Act preserves the right of BProc graduates who registered before 1 January 1999 to be admitted as attorneys, provided all other requirements are met. Section 112(2) does not prevent the registration of practical vocational training contracts for such graduates. Regulation 6 must be read to include BProc graduates as qualifying for registration of practical vocational training contracts until Parliament amends the Act or Regulations. The Legal Practice Council is ordered to register the applicants' contracts retrospectively, provided all statutory requirements are met. The application for constitutional invalidity is postponed sine...
- Citation
- [2022] ZAGPPHC 170
- Parties
- Applicant: Gabaikangwe Evelyn Thendele; Applicant: Zwelibanzi Solumba Thendele; Respondent: Legal Practice Council; Respondent: Minister of Justice and Correctional Services; Respondent: Minister of Higher Education and Training
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 28 March 2022
- Case Number
- 10641/2020
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application for constitutional invalidity postponed sine die; declaratory and mandatory relief granted regarding registration of practical vocational training contracts for BProc graduates; costs order that each party pays its own costs.
- Judges
- E van der Schyff
- Legal Topics
- Legal Practitioners Admission, Transitional Arrangements, Constitutional Invalidity, Practical Vocational Training, Regulation Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gabaikangwe Evelyn Thendele
Applicant
Zwelibanzi Solumba Thendele
Applicant
Legal Practice Council
Respondent
Minister of Justice and Correctional Services
Respondent
Minister of Higher Education and Training
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether section 26(1)(a) of the Legal Practice Act and regulation 6 validly preclude BProc graduates from registering practical vocational training contracts.
- 2 Whether section 112(2) of the Legal Practice Act excludes BProc graduates from registering practical vocational training contracts.
- 3 Whether the refusal by the Legal Practice Council to register the applicants' contracts was lawful.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that section 112(2) of the Legal Practice Act preserves the right of BProc graduates who registered before 1 January 1999 to be admitted as attorneys, provided all other requirements are met. Section 112(2) does not prevent the registration of practical vocational training contracts for such graduates. Regulation 6 must be read to include BProc graduates as qualifying for registration of practical vocational training contracts until Parliament amends the Act or Regulations. The Legal Practice Council is ordered to register the applicants' contracts retrospectively, provided all statutory requirements are met. The application for constitutional invalidity is postponed sine...
Court Disposition
Application for constitutional invalidity postponed sine die; declaratory and mandatory relief granted regarding registration of practical vocational training contracts for BProc graduates; costs order that each party pays its own costs.
Orders
- The application for constitutional invalidity of sections 26(1)(a) and 112(2) of the Legal Practice Act, 28 of 2014 is postponed sine die.
- The first and second applicants are not precluded from registering practical vocational contracts by virtue of being BProc graduates.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment