Theunissen v Goldfields Resort (Pty) Ltd and Another (3520/2017) [2023] ZAFSHC 221 (1 June 2023)
The court found that the expert evidence regarding the plaintiff's injuries and residual working capacity was uncontested and established that she is only suitable for sedentary work. The actuarial calculations based on contingency deductions of 5%, 15%, and 35% were accepted as fair and reasonable, as the defendants failed to provide substantive evidence to justify deviation. The court held that the plaintiff suffered a loss of earning capacity and is entitled to damages calculated on the admitted expert evidence and actuarial reports. The future medical expenses as calculated were also accepted as reasonable and undisputed. Accordingly, the court awarded the plaintiff R1,527,306 for...
- Citation
- [2023] ZAFSHC 221
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Beatrix Gerda Theunissen; Defendant: Goldfields Resort (Pty) Ltd; Defendant: Virginia Park Hotel (Pty) Ltd t/a Tikwe Lodge
- Court
- Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 1 June 2023
- Case Number
- 3520/2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Trial / Quantum Determination After Partial Settlement
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's claim for loss of earnings and future medical expenses is granted in the amounts calculated by the actuaries and accepted by the court.
- Judges
- M E Mahlangu
- Legal Topics
- Personal Injury, Loss of Earning Capacity, Future Medical Expenses, Contingency Deduction, Assessment of Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Beatrix Gerda Theunissen
Plaintiff
Goldfields Resort (Pty) Ltd
Defendant
Virginia Park Hotel (Pty) Ltd t/a Tikwe Lodge
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Quantum Determination After Partial Settlement
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the appropriate quantum for the plaintiff's loss of earnings resulting from the injuries sustained at Tikwe Lodge.
- 2 What is the reasonable amount for future medical expenses arising from the plaintiff's injuries.
- 3 What contingency deductions should be applied to the calculation of damages.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the expert evidence regarding the plaintiff's injuries and residual working capacity was uncontested and established that she is only suitable for sedentary work. The actuarial calculations based on contingency deductions of 5%, 15%, and 35% were accepted as fair and reasonable, as the defendants failed to provide substantive evidence to justify deviation. The court held that the plaintiff suffered a loss of earning capacity and is entitled to damages calculated on the admitted expert evidence and actuarial reports. The future medical expenses as calculated were also accepted as reasonable and undisputed. Accordingly, the court awarded the plaintiff R1,527,306 for...
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's claim for loss of earnings and future medical expenses is granted in the amounts calculated by the actuaries and accepted by the court.
Orders
- The defendants are ordered to pay the plaintiff R1,527,306 for loss of earnings after apportionment.
- The defendants are ordered to pay the plaintiff R930,244 for future medical expenses after apportionment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment