Thorburn Security Solutions Southern Region (Pty) Ltd t/a Thorburn Armed Response v Mdletye and Others (C131/15) [2017] ZALCCT 32 (2 August 2017)
The court found that the arbitrator committed a reviewable irregularity by failing to properly weigh the conflicting evidence regarding the employee's right to representation at the disciplinary hearing. The court held that the employee was responsible for ensuring his representative's attendance and that there was no evidence the representative was denied attendance due to being on duty. On the substantive issue, the court determined that the instruction given to the employee was reasonable and lawful, and his failure to comply constituted insubordination. The arbitrator's conclusion that the employer accepted the employee's conduct by allowing him to work the disputed shifts was...
- Citation
- [2017] ZALCCT 32
- Parties
- Applicant: Thorburn Security Solutions Southern Region (Pty) Ltd t/a Thorburn Armed Response; Respondent: Sithembela Mdletye; Respondent: CCMA; Respondent: Orlando Moses N.O.
- Court
- Labour Court Cape Town
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 2 August 2017
- Case Number
- C131/15
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Labour Court Review of CCMA Arbitration Award
- Outcome
- The arbitration award is reviewed and set aside. It is replaced with an award that the dismissal of the employee was substantively and procedurally fair.
- Judges
- A J Steenkamp
- Legal Topics
- Insubordination, Unfair Dismissal, Disciplinary Procedure, Procedural Fairness, Substantive Fairness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Thorburn Security Solutions Southern Region (Pty) Ltd t/a Thorburn Armed Response
Applicant
Sithembela Mdletye
Respondent
CCMA
Respondent
Orlando Moses N.O.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Labour Court Review of CCMA Arbitration Award
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the dismissal of the employee for insubordination was substantively and procedurally fair.
- 2 Whether the employee was denied the right to representation at the disciplinary hearing.
- 3 Whether the arbitrator committed a reviewable irregularity in his findings.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the arbitrator committed a reviewable irregularity by failing to properly weigh the conflicting evidence regarding the employee's right to representation at the disciplinary hearing. The court held that the employee was responsible for ensuring his representative's attendance and that there was no evidence the representative was denied attendance due to being on duty. On the substantive issue, the court determined that the instruction given to the employee was reasonable and lawful, and his failure to comply constituted insubordination. The arbitrator's conclusion that the employer accepted the employee's conduct by allowing him to work the disputed shifts was...
Court Disposition
The arbitration award is reviewed and set aside. It is replaced with an award that the dismissal of the employee was substantively and procedurally fair.
Orders
- The arbitration award dated 5 February 2015 under CCMA case number WECT 17731-14 is reviewed and set aside.
- It is replaced with an award that the dismissal of Mr Sithembela Mdletye was substantively and procedurally fair.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment