Tiger Equity One (Pty) Ltd and Another v Competition Commission (019174) [2014] ZACT 91 (24 July 2014)
The Tribunal found that the Competition Commission’s Notice CC 13(2) was not issued in accordance with the procedural requirements set out in the Competition Act. The applicants demonstrated that the notice was procedurally unfair and did not meet the standards of legality required for administrative action. As a result, the Tribunal set aside the notice.
- Citation
- [2014] ZACT 91
- Parties
- Applicant: Tiger Equity One (Pty) Ltd; Applicant: Murray and Roberts Ltd; Respondent: Competition Commission
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 24 July 2014
- Case Number
- 019174
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Order
- Outcome
- The Competition Commission’s Notice CC 13(2) issued on 13 June 2014 is set aside.
- Judges
- N Manoim, T Madima, A Roskam
- Legal Topics
- Review of Commission Notice, Setting Aside Administrative Action
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tiger Equity One (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Murray and Roberts Ltd
Applicant
Competition Commission
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Competition Commission’s Notice CC 13(2) issued on 13 June 2014 should be set aside.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the Competition Commission’s Notice CC 13(2) was not issued in accordance with the procedural requirements set out in the Competition Act. The applicants demonstrated that the notice was procedurally unfair and did not meet the standards of legality required for administrative action. As a result, the Tribunal set aside the notice.
Court Disposition
The Competition Commission’s Notice CC 13(2) issued on 13 June 2014 is set aside.
Orders
- The Competition Commission’s Notice CC 13(2) issued on 13 June 2014 under Competition Commission case number: 2014May0246 is set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment