Tikbox League (Pty) Ltd and Others v Du Toit and Others (B1342/2023) [2023] ZAGPPHC 2025; 2024 (3) SA 198 (GP) (18 December 2023)
The court held that the contract to arrange boxing contests between members of the public, where participants intentionally apply bodily force to settle disputes for profit and fame, is unlawful, contra bones mores, and unenforceable. The event was not legalised under the South African Boxing Act or related regulations, and lawful consent could not be granted for such inherently dangerous contests. Public policy, the Constitution, and statutory provisions criminalise not only the acts but also association and agreements facilitating such activities. The proceeds from these events are the result of unlawful contracts and activities, and any attempt to enforce such contracts is invalid. The...
- Citation
- [2023] ZAGPPHC 2025
- Parties
- Applicant: Tikbox League (Pty) Ltd; Applicant: Daniel Christoffel van Heerden; Applicant: Lindrie Gouws; Applicant: Dominant Slap League (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Francois Jakobus Du Toit; Respondent: Companies and Intellectual Properties Commission; Respondent: Jire Itikets (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Anita Louise Whittaker / Myburg; Respondent: Albertus Johannes Potgieter; Respondent: Johannes Jakobus Jansen van Rensburg
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 18 December 2023
- Case Number
- B1342/2023
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed. No order as to costs. Matter referred to regulatory and prosecutorial authorities.
- Judges
- Le Grange
- Legal Topics
- Contra Bones Mores, Illegal Contracts, Consent in Criminal Law, Public Policy, Organised Crime, Unlawful Activity
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tikbox League (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Daniel Christoffel van Heerden
Applicant
Lindrie Gouws
Applicant
Dominant Slap League (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Francois Jakobus Du Toit
Respondent
Companies and Intellectual Properties Commission
Respondent
Jire Itikets (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Anita Louise Whittaker / Myburg
Respondent
Albertus Johannes Potgieter
Respondent
Johannes Jakobus Jansen van Rensburg
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the contract to arrange boxing contests between members of the public is lawful and enforceable.
- 2 Whether lawful consent can be granted for intentional bodily harm in such contests.
- 3 Whether the proceeds from such contests constitute unlawful activity under South African law.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the contract to arrange boxing contests between members of the public, where participants intentionally apply bodily force to settle disputes for profit and fame, is unlawful, contra bones mores, and unenforceable. The event was not legalised under the South African Boxing Act or related regulations, and lawful consent could not be granted for such inherently dangerous contests. Public policy, the Constitution, and statutory provisions criminalise not only the acts but also association and agreements facilitating such activities. The proceeds from these events are the result of unlawful contracts and activities, and any attempt to enforce such contracts is invalid. The...
Court Disposition
Application dismissed. No order as to costs. Matter referred to regulatory and prosecutorial authorities.
Orders
- The application is dismissed with no order as to costs.
- This order is referred to the Companies and Intellectual Property Commission to consider whether the purpose of the company is lawful and if not to address the issue accordingly.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment