Timeleni Taxi Association v Senior Manager. Registration And Monitoring Provincial Regulatory Entity (Mpumalanga Province) And Others (26913/15) [2016] ZAGPPHC 983 (18 November 2016)
The court held that the National Land Transport Act does not require taxi operators to be members of taxi associations in order to obtain operating licenses or permits. The practice by the regulatory entities of demanding letters of recommendation from registered taxi associations as a pre-requisite for license...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] ZAGPPHC 983
- Parties
- Applicant: Timeleni Taxi Association; Respondent: Senior Manager: Registration and Monitoring, Provincial Regulatory Entity (Mpumalanga Province); Respondent: Operating License Board (District of Ehlanzeni); Respondent: Twin City Development (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: White Hazy Taxi Association
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Case Number
- 26913/15
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted in part; declaratory order issued regarding the unlawfulness of requiring letters of recommendation for operating license applications; costs awarded against the First Respondent.
- Judges
- Du Plessis
- Legal Topics
- National Land Transport Act, Freedom of Association, Operating License Requirements, Unlawful Administrative Practice
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Timeleni Taxi Association
Applicant
Senior Manager: Registration and Monitoring, Provincial Regulatory Entity (Mpumalanga Province)
Respondent
Operating License Board (District of Ehlanzeni)
Respondent
Twin City Development (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
White Hazy Taxi Association
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the National Land Transport Act requires taxi operators to be members of taxi associations to obtain operating licenses or permits.
- 2 Whether the requirement by regulatory entities for letters of recommendation from taxi associations is lawful under the National Land Transport Act.
- 3 Whether the conduct of the Fourth Respondent violates the constitutional right to freedom of association.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the National Land Transport Act does not require taxi operators to be members of taxi associations in order to obtain operating licenses or permits. The practice by the regulatory entities of demanding letters of recommendation from registered taxi associations as a pre-requisite for license applications is not supported by the Act and is therefore unlawful. The insistence by the Fourth Respondent that members remain part of its association infringes on their constitutional right to freedom of association. The court declined to grant certain declaratory orders that merely confirmed the existing statutory and constitutional position, but granted relief in respect of the...
Court Disposition
Application granted in part; declaratory order issued regarding the unlawfulness of requiring letters of recommendation for operating license applications; costs awarded against the First Respondent.
Orders
- Applications for operating licenses or permits under the National Land Transport Act do not require letters of recommendation from any party, including a registered taxi association, as a pre-requisite for acceptance, consideration, or issuance of such licenses or permits.
- The First Respondent is ordered to pay the costs of the application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
39 paragraphs
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
(GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA)
REPORTABLE: NO
OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: NO
REVISED
Case Number: 26913/15
Date: 18 November 2016
In the matter between:
TIMELENI TAXI ASSOCIATION Applicant
and
THE SENIOR MANAGER: REGISTRATION
AND MONITORING, PROVINCIAL REGULATORY
ENTITY (MPUMALANGA PROVINCE) First Respondent
OPERATING LICENSE BOARD (DISTRICT OF EHLANZENI) Second Respondent
TWIN CITY DEVELOPMENT (PTY) LTD Third Respondent
WHITE HAZY TAXI ASSOCIATION Fourth Respondent
JUDGMENT
DU PLESSIS. AJ
This is an application by the Applicant in terms of which it seeks several declaratory orders in the following terms:
1.1. On proper reading of the National Land Transport Act, No 5 of 2009, the Taxi Associations have been reduced to voluntary associations and the individual taxi operators do not have to be members of taxi associations to operate in terms of their operating licenses or permits;
1.2. The members of the Applicant, whose names are listed in Annexure TTA1 to the Applicant's founding affidavit, had a right in terms of Section 18 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 to associate and constitute themselves into the Applicant as they did;
1.3. The conduct of the First and Second Respondent of requiring individual taxi operators, including members of the Applicants to furnish the Provincial Regulatory Entity (PRE) and the Licensing Board with letters of recommendation from registered taxi association for the purposes of issue or renewal of operating licenses or permits or for any assistance relating to their operation as taxi operators is not provided for in the National Land Transport Act, No 5 of 2009 and is therefore unlawful;
1.4. The insistence by the Fourth Respondent that the members of the Applicant listed in Annexure TTA1 to the Applicant's founding affidavit, "its members despite them having renounced such membership, violates the rights of the said members of the Applicant to freedom of association as contained in Section 17 of the Constitution;
1.5 From the outset it needs to be said that the Applicant conceded that prayers 1, 2 and 4 referred to above are to a large extent the confirmation of the current statutory and constitutional state of the status of taxi owners and taxi associations and that it is not appropriate for this court to grant such declaratory orders. The orders are somewhat inelegantly drafted but I shall deal with the orders as they stand and as explained in court because of the importance of this application for the applicants in particular and also the interest that the Taxi fraternity might have in the judgment.;
1.6 I shall give the order below today and shall hand down my reasons for the order in due course.
As a consequence, I make the following declaratory order:
2.1 Applications for operating licenses or permits ,including applications for the renewal or transfer of operating licenses or permits, lodged in terms of the National Land Transport Act No 5 of 2009, as read with the regulations to the National Land Transport Act 5 of 2009 with the First Respondent , the Registration and Monitoring, Provincial Regulatory Entity of Mpumalanga Province and/or with the second Respondent , the Operating License Board of the District of Ehlanzeni, within the province of Mpumalanga, does not require
letters of recommendation from any party , including a registered taxi association , as a pre-requisite for the acceptance of such
applications , for the consideration of such applications and for the issue of such license or permit.
2.2 Costs of the application to be paid by the First Respondent.
_______________________
DU PLESIS AJ
BE MTHIMUNYE (ATTORNEY)
For the Applicant
Instructed by Baphasile Mthimunye Attorneys
ADV P FERREIRA
For the First Respondent:
Instructed by Sam Ledwaba Attorneys Rivonia
Judgment delivered on: 18 November 2016