Tlake v A Re Somang Projects (Pty) Ltd and Others (18894/2020) [2021] ZAGPJHC 466 (30 July 2021)
The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish that the government officials sought to be joined have a direct and substantial legal interest in the outcome of the action. The conversion of the close corporation to a private company did not constitute a cession, transfer, or alienation of the mining right or controlling interest requiring Ministerial consent under section 11 of the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act. The issues for determination are purely contractual and do not involve the officials. The mere fact that officials may possess documents relevant to the dispute does not justify their joinder, as such documents can be obtained through discovery. Joinder...
- Citation
- [2021] ZAGPJHC 466
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Sello Tlake; Defendant: A Re Somang Projects (Pty) Ltd; Defendant: Jack Masekwameng; Defendant: A Re Shomeng Holdings (Pty) Ltd; Defendant: Commissioner of the Companies and Intellectual Property Commission
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 30 July 2021
- Case Number
- 18894/2020
- Procedural Posture
- Joinder Application / Application to Join Government Officials as Defendants; Opposed Motion
- Outcome
- Application for joinder dismissed with costs, including costs of senior counsel.
- Judges
- Windell
- Legal Topics
- Joinder of Parties, Oral Contract, Mining Rights, Shareholder Entitlement, Close Corporation Conversion
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sello Tlake
Plaintiff
A Re Somang Projects (Pty) Ltd
Defendant
Jack Masekwameng
Defendant
A Re Shomeng Holdings (Pty) Ltd
Defendant
Commissioner of the Companies and Intellectual Property Commission
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Joinder Application / Application to Join Government Officials as Defendants; Opposed Motion
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Minister of Mineral Resources and Energy, the Director-General: Mineral Regulation, and the Regional Manager of the DMR have a direct and substantial legal interest in the outcome of the action.
- 2 Whether the conversion of the close corporation to a private company constituted a cession, transfer, or alienation of the mining right or controlling interest requiring Ministerial consent under section 11 of the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act.
- 3 Whether the officials sought to be joined possess documents relevant to the plaintiff's cause of action justifying their joinder.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish that the government officials sought to be joined have a direct and substantial legal interest in the outcome of the action. The conversion of the close corporation to a private company did not constitute a cession, transfer, or alienation of the mining right or controlling interest requiring Ministerial consent under section 11 of the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act. The issues for determination are purely contractual and do not involve the officials. The mere fact that officials may possess documents relevant to the dispute does not justify their joinder, as such documents can be obtained through discovery. Joinder...
Court Disposition
Application for joinder dismissed with costs, including costs of senior counsel.
Orders
- The application is dismissed with costs, including the costs of senior counsel.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment