Tlake v A Re Somang Projects (Pty) Ltd and Others (18894/2020) [2021] ZAGPJHC 466 (30 July 2021)

Tlake v A Re Somang Projects (Pty) Ltd and Others (18894/2020) [2021] ZAGPJHC 466 (30 July 2021)

The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish that the government officials sought to be joined have a direct and substantial legal interest in the outcome of the action. The conversion of the close corporation to a private company did not constitute a cession, transfer, or alienation of the mining right or controlling interest requiring Ministerial consent under section 11 of the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act. The issues for determination are purely contractual and do not involve the officials. The mere fact that officials may possess documents relevant to the dispute does not justify their joinder, as such documents can be obtained through discovery. Joinder...

Citation
[2021] ZAGPJHC 466
Parties
Plaintiff: Sello Tlake; Defendant: A Re Somang Projects (Pty) Ltd; Defendant: Jack Masekwameng; Defendant: A Re Shomeng Holdings (Pty) Ltd; Defendant: Commissioner of the Companies and Intellectual Property Commission
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
30 July 2021
Case Number
18894/2020
Procedural Posture
Joinder Application / Application to Join Government Officials as Defendants; Opposed Motion
Outcome
Application for joinder dismissed with costs, including costs of senior counsel.
Judges
Windell
Legal Topics
Joinder of Parties, Oral Contract, Mining Rights, Shareholder Entitlement, Close Corporation Conversion

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sello Tlake

Plaintiff

A Re Somang Projects (Pty) Ltd

Defendant

Jack Masekwameng

Defendant

A Re Shomeng Holdings (Pty) Ltd

Defendant

Commissioner of the Companies and Intellectual Property Commission

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Joinder Application / Application to Join Government Officials as Defendants; Opposed Motion

  1. 1 Whether the Minister of Mineral Resources and Energy, the Director-General: Mineral Regulation, and the Regional Manager of the DMR have a direct and substantial legal interest in the outcome of the action.
  2. 2 Whether the conversion of the close corporation to a private company constituted a cession, transfer, or alienation of the mining right or controlling interest requiring Ministerial consent under section 11 of the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act.
  3. 3 Whether the officials sought to be joined possess documents relevant to the plaintiff's cause of action justifying their joinder.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish that the government officials sought to be joined have a direct and substantial legal interest in the outcome of the action. The conversion of the close corporation to a private company did not constitute a cession, transfer, or alienation of the mining right or controlling interest requiring Ministerial consent under section 11 of the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act. The issues for determination are purely contractual and do not involve the officials. The mere fact that officials may possess documents relevant to the dispute does not justify their joinder, as such documents can be obtained through discovery. Joinder...

Court Disposition

Application for joinder dismissed with costs, including costs of senior counsel.

Orders

  • The application is dismissed with costs, including the costs of senior counsel.