TLJ Security Services v Tswaing Local Municipality (1376/22) [2023] ZANWHC 232 (18 January 2023)
The court found that the oral agreement between the applicant and the municipality for the provision of security services was concluded in contravention of the statutory procurement framework, specifically the Municipal Finance Management Act and its regulations, as well as Section 217 of the Constitution. The contract was not subjected to a competitive bidding process and was not reduced to writing as required by law. The principle of legality, a cornerstone of constitutional democracy, prohibits organs of state from acting outside the scope of their lawful powers. Estoppel cannot be invoked to validate a contract that is unlawful and ultra vires. The application for default judgment was...
- Citation
- [2023] ZANWHC 232
- Parties
- Applicant: TLJ Security Services; Respondent: Tswaing Local Municipality
- Court
- North West High Court, Mafikeng
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 18 January 2023
- Case Number
- 1376/22
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Application for Default Judgment; Reasons for Dismissal
- Outcome
- Application for default judgment dismissed; contract declared invalid due to non-compliance with statutory procurement requirements.
- Judges
- O.Y Dibetso-Bodibe
- Legal Topics
- Municipal Procurement, Doctrine of Legality, Oral Contracts, Supply Chain Management, Default Judgment, Public Tender Requirements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
TLJ Security Services
Applicant
Tswaing Local Municipality
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application for Default Judgment; Reasons for Dismissal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an oral agreement for the procurement of security services by a municipality is valid under South African law.
- 2 Whether the municipality's failure to follow prescribed supply chain management procedures renders the contract unlawful and unenforceable.
- 3 Whether estoppel can be invoked to validate a contract concluded in contravention of statutory procurement requirements.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the oral agreement between the applicant and the municipality for the provision of security services was concluded in contravention of the statutory procurement framework, specifically the Municipal Finance Management Act and its regulations, as well as Section 217 of the Constitution. The contract was not subjected to a competitive bidding process and was not reduced to writing as required by law. The principle of legality, a cornerstone of constitutional democracy, prohibits organs of state from acting outside the scope of their lawful powers. Estoppel cannot be invoked to validate a contract that is unlawful and ultra vires. The application for default judgment was...
Court Disposition
Application for default judgment dismissed; contract declared invalid due to non-compliance with statutory procurement requirements.
Orders
- The application for default judgment is dismissed.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment