Tlohohelo Junior Primary School v Rastela and Others (JR1309/12) [2017] ZALCJHB 294 (11 August 2017)
The applicant failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for the late filing of opposing papers and did not demonstrate good cause for condonation. The delays were attributed to the applicant's previous attorneys, but such reasons are not acceptable for granting condonation. The applicant also failed to show reasonable prospects of success in the intended review of the arbitration award, as the Commissioner correctly applied section 200A of the Labour Relations Act and found that an employment relationship existed, leading to a finding of unfair dismissal. Consequently, the applications for condonation, rescission, and review were dismissed, and the arbitration award was confirmed and...
- Citation
- [2017] ZALCJHB 294
- Parties
- Applicant: Tlohohelo Junior Primary School; Respondent: Matsie Ratsela; Respondent: Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration; Respondent: Commissioner J.S.C Nkosi N.O
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 11 August 2017
- Case Number
- JR1309/12
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment on Condonation, Rescission, and Review
- Outcome
- Applications for condonation, rescission, and review dismissed; arbitration award confirmed and ordered to be implemented; costs awarded against applicant.
- Judges
- P Deale
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Employment Relationship, Condonation, Rescission of Order, Review of Arbitration Award
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tlohohelo Junior Primary School
Applicant
Matsie Ratsela
Respondent
Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration
Respondent
Commissioner J.S.C Nkosi N.O
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment on Condonation, Rescission, and Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has shown good cause for condonation of late filing of opposing papers.
- 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to rescission of the order making the arbitration award an order of court.
- 3 Whether the applicant has reasonable prospects of success in reviewing the arbitration award.
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for the late filing of opposing papers and did not demonstrate good cause for condonation. The delays were attributed to the applicant's previous attorneys, but such reasons are not acceptable for granting condonation. The applicant also failed to show reasonable prospects of success in the intended review of the arbitration award, as the Commissioner correctly applied section 200A of the Labour Relations Act and found that an employment relationship existed, leading to a finding of unfair dismissal. Consequently, the applications for condonation, rescission, and review were dismissed, and the arbitration award was confirmed and...
Court Disposition
Applications for condonation, rescission, and review dismissed; arbitration award confirmed and ordered to be implemented; costs awarded against applicant.
Orders
- The applications for condonation, rescission and review are dismissed.
- The Order of Van Niekerk J dated 12 June 2014 is confirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment