T.M.N v Y.N (2024/110088) [2025] ZAGPJHC 260 (13 March 2025)
The court found that the respondent failed to adequately address serious allegations of alcohol abuse, parental alienation, and erratic behaviour, despite opportunities to do so. The forensic report by Dr Del Fabbro, supported by objective testing and collateral sources, established chronic excess alcohol use by the respondent, significant co-parenting challenges, and behaviours consistent with parental alienation. The respondent's technical objections and lack of substantive rebuttal were insufficient to counter the evidence. Applying the constitutional and statutory principles, including the McCall criteria, the court determined that the children's best interests required a change of...
- Citation
- [2025] ZAGPJHC 260
- Parties
- Applicant: T.M.N; Respondent: Y.N
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 13 March 2025
- Case Number
- 2024/110088
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Final Determination of Part B After Forensic Report and Supplementary Affidavits
- Outcome
- Application granted. Primary residence of the minor children transferred to the applicant. Respondent's contact to be supervised and therapeutic, subject to compliance with treatment and therapy. Each party to pay their own costs.
- Judges
- F Marcandonatos
- Legal Topics
- Primary Residence, Parental Alienation, Alcohol Abuse, Co Parenting, Children Best Interests, Expert Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
T.M.N
Applicant
Y.N
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Final Determination of Part B After Forensic Report and Supplementary Affidavits
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the primary residence of the minor children should be changed from the respondent to the applicant.
- 2 Whether the respondent's conduct, including alcohol abuse and parental alienation, poses a risk to the children's wellbeing.
- 3 What contact and access arrangements are in the best interests of the children.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the respondent failed to adequately address serious allegations of alcohol abuse, parental alienation, and erratic behaviour, despite opportunities to do so. The forensic report by Dr Del Fabbro, supported by objective testing and collateral sources, established chronic excess alcohol use by the respondent, significant co-parenting challenges, and behaviours consistent with parental alienation. The respondent's technical objections and lack of substantive rebuttal were insufficient to counter the evidence. Applying the constitutional and statutory principles, including the McCall criteria, the court determined that the children's best interests required a change of...
Court Disposition
Application granted. Primary residence of the minor children transferred to the applicant. Respondent's contact to be supervised and therapeutic, subject to compliance with treatment and therapy. Each party to pay their own costs.
Orders
- Primary residence and care of the minor children is awarded to the applicant.
- The respondent's contact with the children shall be supervised and structured, with specifics determined in conjunction with the children's therapist and a case manager.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment