Tonyane and Another v S (CA & R 16/03) [2003] ZANCHC 42 (22 September 2003)

Tonyane and Another v S (CA & R 16/03) [2003] ZANCHC 42 (22 September 2003)

The appellate court found that the trial court erred in elevating the appellants' awareness that the deceased 'ought to have' died from exposure to a finding that they 'actually foresaw' death as a possible consequence of their conduct. The evidence, including the medical testimony, indicated that the deceased died from exposure after being assaulted and left naked and unconscious. However, there was no direct evidence that the appellants subjectively foresaw death as a possible outcome. The court held that the correct conviction should be for culpable homicide, not murder. The sentences for murder were set aside and replaced with sentences of nine years' imprisonment for culpable...

Citation
[2003] ZANCHC 42
Parties
Appellant: Edward Tonyane; Appellant: Andrew Wells; Respondent: The State
Court
Northern Cape High Court, Kimberley
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
22 September 2003
Case Number
CA & R 16/03
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Outcome
Appeal against murder convictions and sentences succeeds; convictions substituted with culpable homicide and sentences reduced. Appeal against robbery conviction and sentence dismissed.
Judges
Majiedt R, Lacock R
Legal Topics
Dolus Eventualis, Manslaughter, Appeal Against Conviction, Sentencing, Identification Evidence
Criminal Law Dolus Eventualis Manslaughter Appeal Against Conviction Sentencing Identification Evidence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Edward Tonyane

Appellant

Andrew Wells

Appellant

The State

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellants were correctly convicted of murder rather than culpable homicide.
  2. 2 Whether the trial court erred in finding dolus eventualis was present.
  3. 3 Whether the sentences imposed were appropriate given the facts.

Ratio Decidendi

The appellate court found that the trial court erred in elevating the appellants' awareness that the deceased 'ought to have' died from exposure to a finding that they 'actually foresaw' death as a possible consequence of their conduct. The evidence, including the medical testimony, indicated that the deceased died from exposure after being assaulted and left naked and unconscious. However, there was no direct evidence that the appellants subjectively foresaw death as a possible outcome. The court held that the correct conviction should be for culpable homicide, not murder. The sentences for murder were set aside and replaced with sentences of nine years' imprisonment for culpable...

Court Disposition

Appeal against murder convictions and sentences succeeds; convictions substituted with culpable homicide and sentences reduced. Appeal against robbery conviction and sentence dismissed.

Orders

  • The appellants' appeal against conviction on count 1 (murder) succeeds. The conviction is set aside and replaced with one of culpable homicide.
  • Both appellants' sentences are set aside and replaced with nine (9) years' imprisonment.