Trans Caledon Tunnel Authority SOC Limited v Bleeker and Others (JR1249/16) [2018] ZALCJHB 261 (15 August 2018)
The court held that Ms Bleeker had established a reasonable expectation that her fixed-term contract would be renewed, based on the employer's practice and her long-standing employment. The applicant failed to lead evidence to justify the non-renewal, and the adverse inference drawn by the commissioner was...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] ZALCJHB 261
- Parties
- Applicant: Trans Caledon Tunnel Authority SOC Limited; Respondent: Carina Bleeker; Respondent: Ronel De Wet; Respondent: Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 15 August 2018
- Case Number
- JR1249/16
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- The review application is dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- P Nkutha-Nkontwana
- Legal Topics
- Fixed Term Contracts, Reasonable Expectation of Renewal, Unfair Dismissal, Performance Bonus, Arbitration Review
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Trans Caledon Tunnel Authority SOC Limited
Applicant
Carina Bleeker
Respondent
Ronel De Wet
Respondent
Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant's failure to renew the first respondent's fixed-term contract constituted a dismissal under section 186(1)(b) of the LRA.
- 2 Whether the decision not to pay the first respondent her performance bonus constituted an unfair labour practice under section 186(2)(a) of the LRA.
- 3 Whether the commissioner committed reviewable irregularities in her conduct and reasoning.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that Ms Bleeker had established a reasonable expectation that her fixed-term contract would be renewed, based on the employer's practice and her long-standing employment. The applicant failed to lead evidence to justify the non-renewal, and the adverse inference drawn by the commissioner was warranted. The moderation of Ms Bleeker's performance score and the denial of her bonus were arbitrary and capricious, as she was not afforded an opportunity to challenge the decision or given prior notice of the criteria applied. The commissioner did not display bias and properly exercised her discretion. The arbitration award was reasonable and fell within the bounds of...
Court Disposition
The review application is dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The review application is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment