Transnet Soc Ltd t/a Transnet Property v EBS Funeral and Tombstones Cash and Carry (4126/2014) [2015] ZAFSHC 26 (19 February 2015)
The court found that the applicant satisfied the requirements for rei vindicatio, being the owner of the premises, with the respondent in possession and the premises identifiable and in existence. The respondent failed to provide proof of payment or a sustainable defence to the arrear rental claim, and did not present evidence to dispute the applicant's calculations. The court held that the applicant was entitled to eviction and to enforce the landlord's tacit hypothec over the respondent's movables for unpaid rent, despite the hypothec not being included in the notice of motion but raised in the affidavit. The respondent's arguments regarding disputes of fact and referral to trial were...
- Citation
- [2015] ZAFSHC 26
- Parties
- Applicant: Transnet SOC Ltd t/a Transnet Property; Respondent: EBS Funerals and Tombstones Cash and Carry
- Court
- Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 19 February 2015
- Case Number
- 4126/2014
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Application for Eviction and Enforcement of Landlord's Tacit Hypothec
- Outcome
- Application granted. The applicant is entitled to eviction and enforcement of landlord's tacit hypothec. Condonation for late filing of respondent's affidavit is granted.
- Judges
- E.K. Tsatsi
- Legal Topics
- Eviction, Landlord Tenant, Tacit Hypothec, Rei Vindicatio, Arrear Rental, Condonation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Transnet SOC Ltd t/a Transnet Property
Applicant
EBS Funerals and Tombstones Cash and Carry
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Application for Eviction and Enforcement of Landlord's Tacit Hypothec
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to evict the respondent from the two leased premises.
- 2 Whether the applicant may enforce a landlord's tacit hypothec over the respondent's movables for unpaid rent.
- 3 Whether condonation should be granted for the late filing of the respondent's opposing affidavit.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant satisfied the requirements for rei vindicatio, being the owner of the premises, with the respondent in possession and the premises identifiable and in existence. The respondent failed to provide proof of payment or a sustainable defence to the arrear rental claim, and did not present evidence to dispute the applicant's calculations. The court held that the applicant was entitled to eviction and to enforce the landlord's tacit hypothec over the respondent's movables for unpaid rent, despite the hypothec not being included in the notice of motion but raised in the affidavit. The respondent's arguments regarding disputes of fact and referral to trial were...
Court Disposition
Application granted. The applicant is entitled to eviction and enforcement of landlord's tacit hypothec. Condonation for late filing of respondent's affidavit is granted.
Orders
- Condonation is granted for the late filing of the respondent's opposing affidavit.
- The applicant is authorised, through the Sheriff, to perfect its landlord's tacit hypothec over the respondent's movables at the two leased premises to recover arrears rental.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment