Triton Express (Pty) Limited v NTM and Others (JR1429/20) [2021] ZALCJHB 236 (16 August 2021)
The court found that the commissioner’s conclusion that the employer failed to establish Mr Baloyi’s guilt was unreasonable. The evidence was uncontested: Mr Baloyi was present at work, smelled of alcohol, tested positive on a breathalyser, and admitted to being under the influence both at the time and at the disciplinary hearing. His explanation for pleading guilty did not provide a credible basis to disregard these admissions. The cumulative effect of the evidence established that Mr Baloyi was at work under the influence of alcohol. Therefore, the commissioner’s finding was not one a reasonable arbitrator could reach, and the award was set aside and substituted with a finding that the...
- Citation
- [2021] ZALCJHB 236
- Parties
- Applicant: Triton Express (Pty) Limited; Respondent: NTM; Respondent: Cliff Baloyi; Respondent: Commissioner Nomusa Mbhele; Respondent: National Bargaining Council for the Road Freight and Logistics Industry
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 16 August 2021
- Case Number
- JR1429/20
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- Review application upheld; arbitration award set aside and substituted with a finding of fair dismissal.
- Judges
- Redding
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Substantive Fairness, Procedural Fairness, Misconduct, Review of Arbitration Award
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Triton Express (Pty) Limited
Applicant
NTM
Respondent
Cliff Baloyi
Respondent
Commissioner Nomusa Mbhele
Respondent
National Bargaining Council for the Road Freight and Logistics Industry
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the commissioner’s award finding the dismissal substantively unfair was reasonable.
- 2 Whether the employer established that Mr Baloyi was guilty of misconduct for being under the influence of alcohol at work.
- 3 Whether the dismissal of Mr Baloyi was substantively and procedurally fair.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the commissioner’s conclusion that the employer failed to establish Mr Baloyi’s guilt was unreasonable. The evidence was uncontested: Mr Baloyi was present at work, smelled of alcohol, tested positive on a breathalyser, and admitted to being under the influence both at the time and at the disciplinary hearing. His explanation for pleading guilty did not provide a credible basis to disregard these admissions. The cumulative effect of the evidence established that Mr Baloyi was at work under the influence of alcohol. Therefore, the commissioner’s finding was not one a reasonable arbitrator could reach, and the award was set aside and substituted with a finding that the...
Court Disposition
Review application upheld; arbitration award set aside and substituted with a finding of fair dismissal.
Orders
- The award issued by the third respondent under case number GPRFBC54493 handed down on 19 June 2019 is reviewed and set aside.
- The decision of the third respondent is substituted with: 'The dismissal of the applicant (Mr Baloyi) is substantively and procedurally fair and his application is dismissed.'
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment