Trustees for the time being of Agapi Trust and Another v Minister, Mineral Resources and Energy and Others (B430/2024) [2024] ZAGPPHC 250 (11 March 2024)
The court found that the applicants had established a right to protect their business from unlawful competition and that the repeated overruling of the Controller's decisions by the Minister raised serious concerns. The applicants demonstrated that the proposed new station would likely cause irreparable harm to their business, and damages would not be an adequate remedy. The respondents' actions, including continuing construction despite adverse court orders and rushing to sign employment contracts, showed they assumed the risk of proceeding without finality. The balance of convenience favoured the applicants, as they should not be forced to endure competition that contravenes statutory...
- Citation
- [2024] ZAGPPHC 250
- Parties
- Applicant: Trustees for the time being of Agapi Trust (John Basil Arsenio, Helen Lucia Arsenou, Laurine Sahd); Applicant: Bizbeth Trading 30 CC; Respondent: Minister, Mineral Resources & Energy; Respondent: Controller of Petroleum Products; Respondent: Casmath Trading (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Grandway Property Investments CC
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 11 March 2024
- Case Number
- B430/2024
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Interim Interdict Pending Review
- Outcome
- Interim interdict granted in favour of the applicants; costs reserved.
- Judges
- Mooki
- Legal Topics
- Petroleum Products Act, Site and Retail Licensing, Interim Interdict, Review of Administrative Action, Balance of Convenience
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Trustees for the time being of Agapi Trust (John Basil Arsenio, Helen Lucia Arsenou, Laurine Sahd)
Applicant
Bizbeth Trading 30 CC
Applicant
Minister, Mineral Resources & Energy
Respondent
Controller of Petroleum Products
Respondent
Casmath Trading (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Grandway Property Investments CC
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Interim Interdict Pending Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants are entitled to an interim interdict preventing the issuing of site and retail licences to the respondents pending review of the Minister's decision.
- 2 Whether the applicants have established a right to protection against unlawful competition under the Petroleum Products Act.
- 3 Whether the balance of convenience favours granting the interdict.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants had established a right to protect their business from unlawful competition and that the repeated overruling of the Controller's decisions by the Minister raised serious concerns. The applicants demonstrated that the proposed new station would likely cause irreparable harm to their business, and damages would not be an adequate remedy. The respondents' actions, including continuing construction despite adverse court orders and rushing to sign employment contracts, showed they assumed the risk of proceeding without finality. The balance of convenience favoured the applicants, as they should not be forced to endure competition that contravenes statutory...
Court Disposition
Interim interdict granted in favour of the applicants; costs reserved.
Orders
- The matter is enrolled and heard on an urgent basis in terms of Rule 6(12).
- Pending finalisation of the relief sought in Part B of the notice of motion, the second respondent is interdicted from issuing site and/or retail licence certificates to the third and fourth respondents for the specified sites in Queenstown.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment