Trustees for the Time Being of the CBS Property Trust and Growthpoint Properties Ltd (107/LM/Nov05) [2006] ZACT 19 (8 March 2006)
- Citation
- [2006] ZACT 19
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Panel
- N Manoim, L Reyburn, M Mokuena
- Case number
- 107/LM/Nov05
More details
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Panel
- N Manoim, L Reyburn, M Mokuena
- Case number
- 107/LM/Nov05
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The Tribunal found that there is no significant competition concern arising from the transaction. The analysis showed that where CBS and Growthpoint compete in the same class of property, there is no geographic overlap, and where they are active in the same geographic nodes, the class of property differs. The Tribunal also found no public interest issues that would alter its view. Accordingly, the merger was approved unconditionally.
Court disposition
Merger approved unconditionally.
Orders
- The merger between The Trustees for the Time Being of the CBS Property Trust and Growthpoint Properties Ltd is approved without conditions.
02
Material facts
Parties
The Trustees for the Time Being of the CBS Property Trust
Applicant Counsel: Advocate O MookiGrowthpoint Properties Ltd
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Large Merger / Merger Approval
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Does the acquisition of nine properties by CBS Property from Growthpoint raise any significant competition concerns?
- 02
Is there any geographic or product market overlap between the merging parties that could lessen competition?
- 03
Are there any public interest issues that would affect the approval of the merger?
Party arguments
- Applicant
- CBS Property argued that the acquisition is part of its strategy to build a property portfolio for listing on the JSE. The properties acquired from Growthpoint are older and of lower quality, and the transaction allows Growthpoint to dispose of assets that no longer meet its investment criteria. CBS currently owns properties in the Western Cape and Gauteng, while Growthpoint owns properties throughout South Africa. The parties submitted that there is no material overlap in their property portfolios that would raise competition concerns.
- Respondent
- Growthpoint submitted that the transaction involves the sale of properties that are not central to its investment strategy. It argued that there is no significant overlap in the geographic locations or classes of properties owned by CBS and Growthpoint. Growthpoint also stated that its interests in other property companies do not confer material influence over those entities. The respondent maintained that the merger would not negatively impact competition or public interest.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998
A merger may be approved if it does not substantially prevent or lessen competition in any market.
- 02
Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998
The Tribunal must consider public interest issues in addition to competition concerns when assessing mergers.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The Tribunal found that there is no significant competition concern arising from the transaction. The analysis showed that where CBS and Growthpoint compete in the same class of property, there is no geographic overlap, and where they are active in the same geographic nodes, the class of property differs. The Tribunal also found no public interest issues that would alter its view. Accordingly, the merger was approved unconditionally.
Obiter and limits
- The delineation of property classes and geographic nodes has been addressed in previous large mergers before the Tribunal.
- The transaction allows Growthpoint to dispose of properties that no longer meet its investment criteria at attractive prices.
Court disposition
Merger approved unconditionally.
- The merger between The Trustees for the Time Being of the CBS Property Trust and Growthpoint Properties Ltd is approved without conditions.
Source and reliance status
Competition Tribunal
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Competition Tribunal
Judgment
COMPETITION TRIBUNAL
REPUBLIC
OF SOUTH AFRICA
Case no: 107/LM/Nov05
In The Large Merger Between:
The Trustees for the Time Being of the CBS Property Trust Acquiring Firm
And
Growthpoint Properties Ltd Target Firm
Reasons for Decision
Approval
On 22 December 2005 the Competition Tribunal issued a Merger Clearance Certificate approving the transaction between The Trustees for the time being of the CBS Property Trust and Growthpoint Properties Ltd. The reasons for this decision follow.
The Transaction
The primary acquiring firm is The Trustees for the time being of the CBS Property Trust (âCBS Propertyâ), which is controlled by CBS Property Portfolio Limited (âCBSâ), an unlisted property company. The primary target firm is Growthpoint Properties Limited, a variable rate property loan stock company listed on the Real Estate sector of the JSE Securities Exchange South Africa (âJSEâ).1
In terms of the transaction, CBS Property will acquire from Growthpoint, a portfolio of nine immovable properties and all right, title and interest in and to lease agreements in respect of the premises forming part of that portfolio from Growthpoint. 2
According to the parties, CBS Property is in the process of acquiring a portfolio of properties for the purposes of listing on the Real Estate sector of the JSE. From Growthpointâs perspective, the target properties are older and of lower quality compared to the overall Growthpoint property portfolio. The parties submit that the current state of the property market makes it possible to dispose of properties that no longer meet Growthpointâs investment criteria at relatively attractive prices.3
The Merging partiesâ activities
CBS Property currently does not have any property portfolio. Both Growthpoint and CBS own property and derive income from rentals received from the tenants in the properties they own. CBS owns property located in the Western Cape and Gauteng. Growthpoint owns 120 properties located throughout South Africa.
Growthpoint also derives income from investments through its shareholding in Centrecity Property Fund Limited and Metboard Properties Limited. The parties submit that none of Growthpointâs interests in these companies confer on it the ability to materially influence the policies of these companies.
Impact on Competition
An examination of the property portfolioâs of CBS and Growthpoint reveals the following:
Where CBS and Growthpoint compete in the same class of property, 4 there is no geographic overlap in their activities;5 and
Where CBS and Growthpoint are active in the same geographic nodes, the class of property differs.6
Based on the information provided to us by the merging parties and the Commission, we are satisfied that the transaction does not raise any significant competition concerns. There are no public interest issues, which would alter our view. The transaction is approved unconditionally.
8 March 2006
N Manoim Date
Concurring: L Reyburn and M Mokuena
For the merging parties: Advocate O Mooki instructed by Jowell Glyn & Marais.
For the Commission: T Kekana and M Matsimela (Mergers and Acquisitions)
1 A list of firms which hold more than 5% of the issued capital of Growthpoint can be found on page 10 of the Merger Record.
2 A list of the properties can be found on page 2 of the Commissionâs Report.
3 See pages 187-188 of the Merger record.
4 The delineation of the various classes of property as well as the various relevant geographic nodes have been dealt with in a number of large mergers before the Tribunal.
5 Growthpointâs commercial properties are located in Gauteng and Kwa-Zulu Natal and CBSâs in the Western Cape. Growthpointâs industrial properties are located in Gauteng and North-West, while CBSâs are located in the Western Cape.
6 Confirmed by Counsel for the merging parties during the hearing â at page 11 of the transcript.
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.